A typical Vatican II sermon. As a priest friend of mine said decades ago about the New Mass, "There is no unction for the soul there." And the "House of Mercy" hasn't been doing much stirring now for sixty years, not thirty-eight -- Leo set himself up for that snide comment.
This is what we could expect an antipope to speak. One who does not benefit from the prayer of Jesus for St Peter (Luke 22:32 I have prayed for you that your faith will not fail and having been converted, you may strengthen your brethren.
The most logical conclusion is thst Prevost election may have been invalid because the cardinals violated Pope JPII's papal law on elections Universi Dominici Gregis by having 133 cardinals voting when the maximum allowed is 120 and also because they elected a candidate who had made statements against Catholic doctrine, contrary to Cum ex Apostilcus Oficio of Pope Paul IV. Because, that a man is the pope is not a presumption of fact, but the conclusion of law and the law was not followed in the election of May 8th, 2025.
Since the cardinals failed in their duty to elect a Catholic pope, according to Pope Nicholas II's Bull In Nome Domine, the faithful of Rome have the right to assemble and elect a Catholic pope in cases where the election has not been pure, sincere and free.
What is the connection “the pool hasn’t stirred for thirty eight years”? I have to be honest I’ve not read most general audience or angelus speeches or meditations since the death of Benedict XVI .
An excellent analysis of Leo XIV lame theology of the psyche. But is he indeed pope? An incisive and utterly compelling analysis here:
https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/18/the-mark-of-those-who-follow-the-antichrist/
And why Catholics may cast off the gas lighting here:
https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/20/are-catholics-required-to-accept-cardinal-prevost-as-leo-xiv/
A typical Vatican II sermon. As a priest friend of mine said decades ago about the New Mass, "There is no unction for the soul there." And the "House of Mercy" hasn't been doing much stirring now for sixty years, not thirty-eight -- Leo set himself up for that snide comment.
Was thinking we are seeing Mt 25:28-29, where Jesus said that those to whom little was given, even it will be taken away. Thanks.
This is what we could expect an antipope to speak. One who does not benefit from the prayer of Jesus for St Peter (Luke 22:32 I have prayed for you that your faith will not fail and having been converted, you may strengthen your brethren.
The most logical conclusion is thst Prevost election may have been invalid because the cardinals violated Pope JPII's papal law on elections Universi Dominici Gregis by having 133 cardinals voting when the maximum allowed is 120 and also because they elected a candidate who had made statements against Catholic doctrine, contrary to Cum ex Apostilcus Oficio of Pope Paul IV. Because, that a man is the pope is not a presumption of fact, but the conclusion of law and the law was not followed in the election of May 8th, 2025.
https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/12/catholics-of-rome-denounce-prevost-as-an-anti-pope/
Since the cardinals failed in their duty to elect a Catholic pope, according to Pope Nicholas II's Bull In Nome Domine, the faithful of Rome have the right to assemble and elect a Catholic pope in cases where the election has not been pure, sincere and free.
https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/11/pope-nicholas-iii-infallibly-taught-that-faithful-can-elect-a-catholic-pope/
What is the connection “the pool hasn’t stirred for thirty eight years”? I have to be honest I’ve not read most general audience or angelus speeches or meditations since the death of Benedict XVI .