Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark's avatar

An excellent analysis of Leo XIV lame theology of the psyche. But is he indeed pope? An incisive and utterly compelling analysis here:

https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/18/the-mark-of-those-who-follow-the-antichrist/

And why Catholics may cast off the gas lighting here:

https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/20/are-catholics-required-to-accept-cardinal-prevost-as-leo-xiv/

Expand full comment
Juan de Avila's avatar

This is what we could expect an antipope to speak. One who does not benefit from the prayer of Jesus for St Peter  (Luke 22:32 I have prayed for you that your faith will not fail and having been converted, you may strengthen your brethren.

The most logical conclusion is thst Prevost election may have been invalid because the cardinals violated Pope JPII's papal law on elections Universi Dominici Gregis by having 133 cardinals voting when the maximum allowed is 120 and also because they elected a candidate who had made statements against Catholic doctrine, contrary to Cum ex Apostilcus Oficio of Pope Paul IV. Because, that a man is the pope is not a presumption of fact, but the conclusion of law and the law was not followed in the election of May 8th, 2025.

https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/12/catholics-of-rome-denounce-prevost-as-an-anti-pope/

Since the cardinals failed in their duty to elect a Catholic pope, according to Pope Nicholas II's Bull In Nome Domine, the faithful of Rome have the right to assemble and elect a Catholic pope in cases where the election has not been pure, sincere and free.

https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/11/pope-nicholas-iii-infallibly-taught-that-faithful-can-elect-a-catholic-pope/

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts