First the Papal State was stolen from us, then the official Church. I think it can be said that a Catholic or a Christian is someone who is hurt by the rape of the Church.
Yet there are many in the rapist Church who have not noticed what has happened, or who deny it, or who identify with their rapists as if they have Stockholm Syndrome. Many pray and go to church, but the destruction continues. I cannot explain this by anything other than that the changed rites and sacraments do not have the power to mediate grace, so the raped Church lacks sanctifying grace. And if we are not in a state of sanctifying grace, we can only pray for ourselves, we cannot pray effectively for others.
So, for those few who can obtain sanctifying grace, we have an even greater responsibility for our brothers and sisters.
Perhaps God allowed our treasure (the Holy Mass and sacraments that mediate grace in the custody of the Church) to be stolen because we took it too natural to possess the supernatural. Now we have to make many, many sacrifices to receive supernatural grace. Now that valid bishops, priests, Masses, and sacraments have become rare, we can finally see what a treasure the Church had guarded for nearly two thousand years until 1969.
You mention 1969 as the pivot point of apostasy, since the NO was imposed on the Church then, but it was a step by step process beginning with the overthrow of a validly elected pope in 1958, as whitesmoke1958.com explains, including interviews 1-3 which contain some info found nowhere else.
So I believe one can say that the long prophesied Great Apostasy in the Church & what Our Lady of La Salette foretold as the "eclipse" of the Church began on Oct. 26, 1958, when 5 minutes of white smoke then turned grayish, & finally black, two days before the Freemason John XXIII appeared before the world to the acclaim of the international media & of Jewish & Masonic organizations. He was given 2 principal duties by "them": call for the Council & make his antipope successor a cardinal. See, e.g., catholicapedia.net/Documents/Chiesa_viva/Chiesa_viva_486_en-_FINAL.pdf (p. 1-2)
The corruption began even earlier. In the books written by Catholic priests of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, we can often find heresies, theological errors, and mystery theological enthusiasms. They no longer guarded the true faith, and in their great optimism they did not notice the enemy who was behold hath desired to have they, that he may sift them as wheat.
You're right. Pius X temporarily put the Modernists on hold but they came back with a vengeance, & it was in large part thru their Modernist machinations re- the sacred liturgy where they focussed their destructive efforts.
See the scholarly (esp. in the notes) but easy to understand Work of Human Hands: A Theological Critique of the Mass of Paul VI by Fr Anthony Cekada, which covers the history & development of both the Traditional & New Mass & the Modernists involved in the creation of the latter: sggresources.org/products/work-of-human-hands-by-rev-anthony-cekada
Thanks for following this garbage, Chris, so we don't have to. Surely there are far more urgent necessities than fitting solar panels? How long will these things last (ten years max??) before they have to be junked and some other fad paid for?
Obviously we should immediately start retrofitting crucifixes, statues of the Sacred Heart, etc with sculptures of a suitably hermaphrodite Jesus, which you highlighted a few days ago as the latest Christological innovation. Yes, here is Sister Bonkers' speech to the assembled Pope, Bishops, etc on 9th June 2025:
You couldn't make this stuff up. Don't worry, Sister Bonkers has made it up for you.
As Pope Leo, etc, apparently said nothing about this outrage, are we allowed to assume that they consented? As St Thomas More declares in "A Man for all seasons", silence gives consent.
Has any other Catholic commentator even mentioned this monstrosity? I can't find any others. They may be trying to pretend that this has not happened, out of fear that their readers will think that the commentator has finally slipped his cable. Or out of utter desperation as they try to keep up the pretence that the former Robert Prevost is really different from Pope Francis.
Obviously the new hermaphrodite Jesus should be heavily pregnant, to prove that He is a good Catholic and has not been using contraception....
At least this lunacy should save on fuel as the incandescent fury of the faithful and sane raises the temperature.
A tenth anniversary celebrating the hippy wafflings of a deceased blasphemer and apostate. The V2 leaders and their gang are cruel creatures. If there is anything sacred or venerable within reach they must debase it in order to deny it.
Folks, don't be surprised. Who do you think is in control of the Vatican Curia? Not Faithful Catholics. I don't expect anything that is Catholic from the Vatican or Conciliar/Synodal bishops.
The Judeo-Masonic powers of darkness under Satan (emphasis on the first half of the infernal relationship) have controlled the Vatican ever since their "chosen candidate," John XXIII was invalidly elected as an antipope in 1958.
Chris Jackson rightly points to the most important factor: the Church should focus on Her mission of the salvation of souls. Nevertheless, it serves a useful purpose to dismantle the bad logic and climate science of Francis the False in Laudato Si.
It is frequently alleged that carbon dioxide (CO2) drives global temperatures, yet without physical experimental proof. Climate models are not physical proof, especially when tuned to produce a pre-determined answer. Temperature increase observed when CO2 is irradiated in a tube in a lab is not proof. It’s a physical experiment, but pertinent climate co-factors are absent that completely change the answer.
On the other hand, there are 3 solid proofs that CO2 has an effect on global temperature that is indistinguishable from zero.
1/ Temperature always changes before CO2 in the alternations between Ice Ages and warm Interglacial eras. This observation is obtained from Antarctic ice cores that go back 800,000+ years from which information on temperature and CO2 and their relationship in time is derived. This proves that temperature drives CO2, not the opposite. This effect is presumably due to degassing huge amounts of CO2 from the oceans during warming and re-gassing during cooling (the Coca-Cola effect, or Henry’s Law).
2/ The effect of CO2 on temperature can be obtained algebraically. The known effects of sun, volcanic activity and ENSO (El Nino Southern Oscillation) are subtracted from time-temperature series, leaving as residual the effect of CO2. Before subtraction, the lines are upward sloping with time. After subtraction, line slopes are statistically indistinguishable from zero, meaning that the effect of CO2 is too small to be detected. Zero, for all practical purposes.
3/ The forward and backward statistical correlation of CO2 and temperature is determined. There is no correlation between CO2 and temperature 6 months later. On the other hand, there is high correlation between temperature and CO2 6 months later. So, again, it is seen that temperature drives CO2, not the other way around.
By means of 3 different physical experimental approaches, it is shown that CO2 depends on temperature, but temperature doesn’t depend on CO2. Why not? Because other larger factors control global temperatures. The idea of CO2-driven runaway global temperature is disproved.
Very informative but "Antarctic ice cores that go back 800,000+ years" is wrong. Not only is Darwinian evolution wrong, but theistic or creative (God directed) molecules to man evolution over billions of years is contrary to both true science & Catholic teaching from the beginning. Genesis 1-11 is not myth but historical, Moses having had revealed to him all that he wrote there. The universe is really less than 8000 years old, the Uniformitarian theory of geological formation is wrong & Catastrophism has all the evidence in its favor. See kolbecenter.org & also Hugh Owen on YouTube.
That's fine if you want to believe that. So, take my commentary a meaning "as if it has the appearance." That is, the ice core data is "as if it has the appearance" of being 800,000+ years old, and "as if it has the appearance" that temperature always changes before CO2, etc. Still proves the point that it is "as if it has the appearance" that temperature drives CO2. And the other two proofs still stand.
I don't think you're imputing anything said on my part as denying abrupt theistic intervention. In case you are, I've done the statistical-time calculation for molecular evolution of proteins, and it's statistically impossible within a universe age "as if it has the appearance" of double digit billions of years. So, yes, abrupt theistic intervention, such a the Pre-Cambrian explosion, rather than evolution over billions of years. If the age of the universe determined 4 ways is "as if it has the appearance" of about 13.4 billion years old, and we represent that as a drop of water, the time for protein evolution would on a statistical basis take a sphere of water having the diameter of the planet of Uranus. Obviously impossible, if we restrict the age of the universe "as if it has the appearance" of 13.4 billion years.
The Vatican can save some money and scrap this project. No need to bother. The way things are going, Vlad Putin is going to reduce St Peters to a pile of atomic rubble in six months or so. And I know this will offend many, but good riddance. That whole Baroque Monstrousity, with its ghey chubby cheribs and half naked Apostles, built with the blood, sweat and tears of German Peasants extorted by the Bank of Fugger by paying money for "indulgences", deserves no better fate. I just hope the Directed Energy Weapons or whatever they use don't damage the bones of St Peter too much. But then again why does that matter. Sts Peter and Paul are coming soon with flaming swords alongside Our Lord Jesus Christ at His Second Coming to dispose of Antichrist and his Nest of Satanic Pederasts.
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us. You are our only hope!
We don't see much commentary discussing the transformation of the Vatican from a place of Catholic pilgrimage to a Catholic "theme park," but we've been watching this godless commercial scourge besetting all of our shrines and Cathedrals for many decades. The Holy Land in the Levant sees the same process slowly taking place... "Come visit the land where Jesus Christ walked! Buy two t-shirts get one free!" Our Savior showed us how to deal with the money changers in the temple. I can't go to Rome or Jerusalem and overturn tables, so... the best I can do is to just scratch Rome and Jerusalem from my retirement travel plans. And not give a nickel to the any diocesan appeals for cash that keep the green Catholic climate machine in business.
I'd leave out Fatima from your travel plans as well. It is now an "ecumenical" inter-religious pilgrimage site with Masonic symbolism in many places. It has been taken over by the Judeo-Masonic powers of darkness just like the papacy, the Vatican & the organizational structures of the Church.
I think that quote from Mary, "Portugal will always retain the doctrine of the faith...." may either continue with "if...." or else it is a spurious addition by an enemy infiltrator. I heard that Montini & Escriva were involved in having Sr Lucia leave her convent & become a Carmelite, even though she was happy wher she was. I believe that was in preparation for "disappearing" & likely eliminating her.
Thare's also the suppression & hijacking of the Third Secret of Fatima.
Few know that the Third Secret was read by Pius XII in 1957 in the company of various prelates (unpublicized), one of them being the American Cardinal Samuel Stritch, who indirectly revealed 2 parts of it to 2 priest associates:
And that can only happen under a false pope, "the top," as Cardinal Mario Ciappi revealed. Cardinal Ciappi, who read the Secret, said "In the Third Secret it is revealed, among other things, that the Great Apostasy in the Church will begin at the top," i.e. with John XXIII & his successors, which allowed the counterfeit, Masonic-inspired Vatican II church to be created, with new doctrines, laws & disciplines, new supernaturally gutted Mass, several invalid sacramental rites, leading to the exodus of many millions of Catholics & tens of thousands of priests & religious. It was & still is an unprecedented revolution in the Church, or rather, newly created counter-church. How such a thing could happen is explained at whitesmoke1958.com
All this is very hard to accept by those adhering to the V2 church, but the convergence of evidence: historical, theological (on that see novusordowatch.org) & in prophecy is substantial, even overwhelming, at least to me, but I've spent a good amount of time studying it. I also experienced the revolution unfold, step by step, since the mid-1960s.
Agree with you completely. However, I object to the use of the word"iconic" other than in connection with Ikons, often Orthodox, and not with reference to images of famous buildings, views, celebrities, sexual athletes, and the creations of "influencers". God bless!
They should put a windmill in the top of the dome and generate electricity from all the rising hot air.
From the flagrant, old farts within.
First the Papal State was stolen from us, then the official Church. I think it can be said that a Catholic or a Christian is someone who is hurt by the rape of the Church.
Yet there are many in the rapist Church who have not noticed what has happened, or who deny it, or who identify with their rapists as if they have Stockholm Syndrome. Many pray and go to church, but the destruction continues. I cannot explain this by anything other than that the changed rites and sacraments do not have the power to mediate grace, so the raped Church lacks sanctifying grace. And if we are not in a state of sanctifying grace, we can only pray for ourselves, we cannot pray effectively for others.
So, for those few who can obtain sanctifying grace, we have an even greater responsibility for our brothers and sisters.
Perhaps God allowed our treasure (the Holy Mass and sacraments that mediate grace in the custody of the Church) to be stolen because we took it too natural to possess the supernatural. Now we have to make many, many sacrifices to receive supernatural grace. Now that valid bishops, priests, Masses, and sacraments have become rare, we can finally see what a treasure the Church had guarded for nearly two thousand years until 1969.
Supernatural Grace is always only a Rosary Away.
You mention 1969 as the pivot point of apostasy, since the NO was imposed on the Church then, but it was a step by step process beginning with the overthrow of a validly elected pope in 1958, as whitesmoke1958.com explains, including interviews 1-3 which contain some info found nowhere else.
So I believe one can say that the long prophesied Great Apostasy in the Church & what Our Lady of La Salette foretold as the "eclipse" of the Church began on Oct. 26, 1958, when 5 minutes of white smoke then turned grayish, & finally black, two days before the Freemason John XXIII appeared before the world to the acclaim of the international media & of Jewish & Masonic organizations. He was given 2 principal duties by "them": call for the Council & make his antipope successor a cardinal. See, e.g., catholicapedia.net/Documents/Chiesa_viva/Chiesa_viva_486_en-_FINAL.pdf (p. 1-2)
Yes. Thank you brother. I will read it.
The corruption began even earlier. In the books written by Catholic priests of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, we can often find heresies, theological errors, and mystery theological enthusiasms. They no longer guarded the true faith, and in their great optimism they did not notice the enemy who was behold hath desired to have they, that he may sift them as wheat.
You're right. Pius X temporarily put the Modernists on hold but they came back with a vengeance, & it was in large part thru their Modernist machinations re- the sacred liturgy where they focussed their destructive efforts.
See the scholarly (esp. in the notes) but easy to understand Work of Human Hands: A Theological Critique of the Mass of Paul VI by Fr Anthony Cekada, which covers the history & development of both the Traditional & New Mass & the Modernists involved in the creation of the latter: sggresources.org/products/work-of-human-hands-by-rev-anthony-cekada
youtube.com/watch?v=KN7oftiL4XY (chapter summaries)
Thank you very much! Cekada is very very good!
Your writing & knowledge leaves me breathless! Thank you!
I think some people in Vatican don't have enough to do. John XXIII - how many people work at the Vatican? "About half."
Thanks for following this garbage, Chris, so we don't have to. Surely there are far more urgent necessities than fitting solar panels? How long will these things last (ten years max??) before they have to be junked and some other fad paid for?
Obviously we should immediately start retrofitting crucifixes, statues of the Sacred Heart, etc with sculptures of a suitably hermaphrodite Jesus, which you highlighted a few days ago as the latest Christological innovation. Yes, here is Sister Bonkers' speech to the assembled Pope, Bishops, etc on 9th June 2025:
https://www.silerenonpossum.com/upload/files/59bca7c7-c2d5-44d2-9a8b-ee7206b66040.pdf
You couldn't make this stuff up. Don't worry, Sister Bonkers has made it up for you.
As Pope Leo, etc, apparently said nothing about this outrage, are we allowed to assume that they consented? As St Thomas More declares in "A Man for all seasons", silence gives consent.
Has any other Catholic commentator even mentioned this monstrosity? I can't find any others. They may be trying to pretend that this has not happened, out of fear that their readers will think that the commentator has finally slipped his cable. Or out of utter desperation as they try to keep up the pretence that the former Robert Prevost is really different from Pope Francis.
Obviously the new hermaphrodite Jesus should be heavily pregnant, to prove that He is a good Catholic and has not been using contraception....
At least this lunacy should save on fuel as the incandescent fury of the faithful and sane raises the temperature.
A tenth anniversary celebrating the hippy wafflings of a deceased blasphemer and apostate. The V2 leaders and their gang are cruel creatures. If there is anything sacred or venerable within reach they must debase it in order to deny it.
The Vatican's new business partner, the CCP will supply the "green" components for the future Xi Jinping Memorial Museum.
It says there are 12 comments but I can access only 2. What's going on?
Not sure.
OK now. 🤔
Folks, don't be surprised. Who do you think is in control of the Vatican Curia? Not Faithful Catholics. I don't expect anything that is Catholic from the Vatican or Conciliar/Synodal bishops.
The Judeo-Masonic powers of darkness under Satan (emphasis on the first half of the infernal relationship) have controlled the Vatican ever since their "chosen candidate," John XXIII was invalidly elected as an antipope in 1958.
Chris Jackson rightly points to the most important factor: the Church should focus on Her mission of the salvation of souls. Nevertheless, it serves a useful purpose to dismantle the bad logic and climate science of Francis the False in Laudato Si.
It is frequently alleged that carbon dioxide (CO2) drives global temperatures, yet without physical experimental proof. Climate models are not physical proof, especially when tuned to produce a pre-determined answer. Temperature increase observed when CO2 is irradiated in a tube in a lab is not proof. It’s a physical experiment, but pertinent climate co-factors are absent that completely change the answer.
On the other hand, there are 3 solid proofs that CO2 has an effect on global temperature that is indistinguishable from zero.
1/ Temperature always changes before CO2 in the alternations between Ice Ages and warm Interglacial eras. This observation is obtained from Antarctic ice cores that go back 800,000+ years from which information on temperature and CO2 and their relationship in time is derived. This proves that temperature drives CO2, not the opposite. This effect is presumably due to degassing huge amounts of CO2 from the oceans during warming and re-gassing during cooling (the Coca-Cola effect, or Henry’s Law).
2/ The effect of CO2 on temperature can be obtained algebraically. The known effects of sun, volcanic activity and ENSO (El Nino Southern Oscillation) are subtracted from time-temperature series, leaving as residual the effect of CO2. Before subtraction, the lines are upward sloping with time. After subtraction, line slopes are statistically indistinguishable from zero, meaning that the effect of CO2 is too small to be detected. Zero, for all practical purposes.
3/ The forward and backward statistical correlation of CO2 and temperature is determined. There is no correlation between CO2 and temperature 6 months later. On the other hand, there is high correlation between temperature and CO2 6 months later. So, again, it is seen that temperature drives CO2, not the other way around.
By means of 3 different physical experimental approaches, it is shown that CO2 depends on temperature, but temperature doesn’t depend on CO2. Why not? Because other larger factors control global temperatures. The idea of CO2-driven runaway global temperature is disproved.
To Jesus through Mary, Claude
Very informative but "Antarctic ice cores that go back 800,000+ years" is wrong. Not only is Darwinian evolution wrong, but theistic or creative (God directed) molecules to man evolution over billions of years is contrary to both true science & Catholic teaching from the beginning. Genesis 1-11 is not myth but historical, Moses having had revealed to him all that he wrote there. The universe is really less than 8000 years old, the Uniformitarian theory of geological formation is wrong & Catastrophism has all the evidence in its favor. See kolbecenter.org & also Hugh Owen on YouTube.
See also Cataclysm From Space, 2800 BC – The Cause of the Biblical Flood: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oor7Cl0rN7I&t=3s
That's fine if you want to believe that. So, take my commentary a meaning "as if it has the appearance." That is, the ice core data is "as if it has the appearance" of being 800,000+ years old, and "as if it has the appearance" that temperature always changes before CO2, etc. Still proves the point that it is "as if it has the appearance" that temperature drives CO2. And the other two proofs still stand.
I don't think you're imputing anything said on my part as denying abrupt theistic intervention. In case you are, I've done the statistical-time calculation for molecular evolution of proteins, and it's statistically impossible within a universe age "as if it has the appearance" of double digit billions of years. So, yes, abrupt theistic intervention, such a the Pre-Cambrian explosion, rather than evolution over billions of years. If the age of the universe determined 4 ways is "as if it has the appearance" of about 13.4 billion years old, and we represent that as a drop of water, the time for protein evolution would on a statistical basis take a sphere of water having the diameter of the planet of Uranus. Obviously impossible, if we restrict the age of the universe "as if it has the appearance" of 13.4 billion years.
The specific protein structure I used was a precursor to insulin containing 80 amino acids.
To Jesus through Mary, Claude
The Vatican can save some money and scrap this project. No need to bother. The way things are going, Vlad Putin is going to reduce St Peters to a pile of atomic rubble in six months or so. And I know this will offend many, but good riddance. That whole Baroque Monstrousity, with its ghey chubby cheribs and half naked Apostles, built with the blood, sweat and tears of German Peasants extorted by the Bank of Fugger by paying money for "indulgences", deserves no better fate. I just hope the Directed Energy Weapons or whatever they use don't damage the bones of St Peter too much. But then again why does that matter. Sts Peter and Paul are coming soon with flaming swords alongside Our Lord Jesus Christ at His Second Coming to dispose of Antichrist and his Nest of Satanic Pederasts.
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us. You are our only hope!
We don't see much commentary discussing the transformation of the Vatican from a place of Catholic pilgrimage to a Catholic "theme park," but we've been watching this godless commercial scourge besetting all of our shrines and Cathedrals for many decades. The Holy Land in the Levant sees the same process slowly taking place... "Come visit the land where Jesus Christ walked! Buy two t-shirts get one free!" Our Savior showed us how to deal with the money changers in the temple. I can't go to Rome or Jerusalem and overturn tables, so... the best I can do is to just scratch Rome and Jerusalem from my retirement travel plans. And not give a nickel to the any diocesan appeals for cash that keep the green Catholic climate machine in business.
I'd leave out Fatima from your travel plans as well. It is now an "ecumenical" inter-religious pilgrimage site with Masonic symbolism in many places. It has been taken over by the Judeo-Masonic powers of darkness just like the papacy, the Vatican & the organizational structures of the Church.
Has Portugal kept the Faith? Doesn't seem to have.
I think that quote from Mary, "Portugal will always retain the doctrine of the faith...." may either continue with "if...." or else it is a spurious addition by an enemy infiltrator. I heard that Montini & Escriva were involved in having Sr Lucia leave her convent & become a Carmelite, even though she was happy wher she was. I believe that was in preparation for "disappearing" & likely eliminating her.
sisterlucytruth.org
I have wondered about some of the Fatima 'accretions'.
Thare's also the suppression & hijacking of the Third Secret of Fatima.
Few know that the Third Secret was read by Pius XII in 1957 in the company of various prelates (unpublicized), one of them being the American Cardinal Samuel Stritch, who indirectly revealed 2 parts of it to 2 priest associates:
youtube.com/watch?v=nO-8UhGOagg&t=4s (3 min, 40 sec; the YT channel has more)
Even Benedict XVI when cardinal credibly revealed to Fr Dollinger, a close friend of his, that the Third Secret included the foretelling of "a bad council and a bad mass": onepeterfive.com/cardinal-ratzinger-not-published-whole-third-secret-fatima
And that can only happen under a false pope, "the top," as Cardinal Mario Ciappi revealed. Cardinal Ciappi, who read the Secret, said "In the Third Secret it is revealed, among other things, that the Great Apostasy in the Church will begin at the top," i.e. with John XXIII & his successors, which allowed the counterfeit, Masonic-inspired Vatican II church to be created, with new doctrines, laws & disciplines, new supernaturally gutted Mass, several invalid sacramental rites, leading to the exodus of many millions of Catholics & tens of thousands of priests & religious. It was & still is an unprecedented revolution in the Church, or rather, newly created counter-church. How such a thing could happen is explained at whitesmoke1958.com
All this is very hard to accept by those adhering to the V2 church, but the convergence of evidence: historical, theological (on that see novusordowatch.org) & in prophecy is substantial, even overwhelming, at least to me, but I've spent a good amount of time studying it. I also experienced the revolution unfold, step by step, since the mid-1960s.
Sustainability? I wonder how well the new, green, sustainable St. Peter's will be able to sustain a couple of well-placed terrorist bombs.
Agree with you completely. However, I object to the use of the word"iconic" other than in connection with Ikons, often Orthodox, and not with reference to images of famous buildings, views, celebrities, sexual athletes, and the creations of "influencers". God bless!