The Vatican II Novus Ordo is an antichurch with an antipope. Find an SSPX chapel or a CMRI chapel to receive the sacraments. Otherwise, stay home, watch a TLM on TV, and make a spiritual Holy Communion.
First CMRI are outside the Church as you have to submit to the pope to be saved. What is so special about the SSPX? They hoisted thei petard on the Latin Mass, then caved into the antipope and pope usurper Cardinal Prevost, oh and told their parishoners to accept the vax. Yeah!
I have been to numerous novus ordo churches in order to fulfil my Sunday obligation where I have found many devout good catholics despite the poverty of the rite, which only goes to prove that Christ protects his flock.
So Paul, if you have to submit to the pope to be saved, and the pope is an apostate, doesn’t that make you an apostate? If a pope will not submit to Christ, why submit to a pope?
God gave you the ability to think critically, one of the most impotant attributes that seperate us from the animal kingdom. Of course you don't submit to an apostate pope - Francis anyone? the usurper pope Cardinal Prevost - because the law has not been observed in both cases. In the case of Francis who was an antipope all the time until Benedict died. Benedict, deliberately or otherwise, failed to renounce the papacy as prescribed in Canon Law 332§2; the cardinals were remiss in not questioning him about what his intentions were, so they rushed to conclave and falsely elected Bergoglio. That great trad hope, Burke, who served as the Prefect of the Apostolic Signature, should really have known that Benedict didn't renounce the papacy according to canon law. Why the silence?
There are countless times throughout history where popes have spoken or acted erroneously, in those cases wise Catholics knew their faith and didn't give assent to them. We are taught not to obey the popes in everything, but only in the things which correspond to faith and truth. Maybe there is a reason in the chaplet to St Michael in the chaplet about principalities, that we are taught 'may the Lord fill us with a true spirit of obedience'.
They hoisted their petard on the Latin Mass. Like all trads, we have exhausted far too much time on the aberrations of the New Mass and not seen how a wolf has entered the sheepfold. Even The Remnant wont allow discussion on the failed abdication of Benedict, or the anti-papacy of Bergoglio, let alone the errors in the election of Prevost. Recognise and Resist but please don't try and change the situation.
Actually, the evidence was there before Leo ever became pope. That evidence was JPII’s and Ratzinger‘s arbitrary, unilateral, theological, revisionism concerning capital punishment for murder, which contradicted centuries of teaching from both scripture and tradition. It also turned the catechism into nothing more than a propaganda tool for papal agendas. Leo’s move here reeks of that.
If a magisterium has no more value than the Ministry of Truth in Orwell’s 1984, then Catholicism’s fundamental integrity is destroyed.
I actually wrote about this years ago for a Catholic publication:
Vatican I is false. The monarchal papacy has no warrant from Scripture or the early Church. The Pope was 'first among equals'. That's all. Jorge B PROVES the current model is false. And there is NO way to impeach a tyrant or a heretic.
Look at the First Council of Jerusalem, where Peter laid down the law to the assembly. Nobody contradicted him, nobody tried to get him to change his mind, because they knew he was the pope. It was the first exercise of papal infallibility, no first among equals, and it saved the Church.
"Dialogue, process, and popular piety weaponized as pseudo-magisterium." The Universal Ordinary Magisterium is infallible. If something promulgated from a purported pope is promulgated by the majority (moral unanimity) of bishops it enjoys the protection of the Holy Ghost to be error free. V2 is what it looks and sounds like - a new religion.
I think the Trinitarians did _not_ have a majority for quite some time during the Arian Controversy and the pope was not super helpful during this time. It was a floundering moment that rhymes with the present.
"It is simply not true, historically, that the pope and the entire hierarchy stopped teaching Catholic doctrine. The popes never taught heresy or anything close to it. The bishops who taught heresy were Arian bishops, who were intruders appointed not by popes but by emperors. Catholic bishops were deprived of their sees and sent into exile. It is furthermore true that the problem was not universal. The West was not nearly as much affected by the heresy as the East. There are, as well, some fine examples of popes during that fourth-century period who unwaveringly taught Catholic doctrine.
Some bring up the case of Pope Liberius who allegedly signed an ambiguous formula of a council. It is not even certain that he did sign it, but what is certain is that he did not teach it as Catholic doctrine. Consequently the worst that could be said of Liberius is that he fell personally into heresy, but it cannot be asserted that he taught it to the Church. This is a critical point.
Even this fall, however, is doubtful, for upon his return to Rome from exile, he was hailed as a great hero of the Faith. This was the same Rome which refused the emperor’s appointee to replace Liberius, whose name was Felix. The Roman Catholics refused him, not because he was an Arian, but because he was in communion with the Arians. Consequently, they never would have hailed Liberius if he had truly fallen.
Thanks for sharing. Too bad the author doesn't provide his sources. I would read them. This seems to me the most useful historical analog for the present.
I saw the phrase "participatory bodies" and with my old eyes I thought it said "participatory HODIES." That makes about as much sense, and maybe Leo is bringing Latin back.
I am going to visit my parish synod and point out that THE NEW SPRINGTIME OF VATICAN II and the MOVEMENTS OF THE SPIRIT, using THE NEW EVANGELIZATION under the guidance of SYNODALITY, will being about the NEW ADVENT leading to THE CIVILIZATION OF LOVE. I hope to drown them in their own bullshit.
Great article to summarise what every faithful priest needs to know, as the persecution of all who reject what is proposed is not far away. The fork in the pathway ahead for all of them will challenge their faithfulness to Christ.
Not that long ago many would still have faithful sensibilities to fall back on, with the ability to say these guidelines and proposals constitutes a schism, but sadly after over a decade of conditioning, many priests fail to see hiding behind the false notion of “obedience”. Many have been stripped of their discerning faculties through prolonged lukewarmness, many now unable to fight for the Truth in and of Christ. Or so it would seem. I pray many now see the need to stand ip and be countered against this centuries coming “Revolution in Rome”
On the day of Bergoglio’s death after a local priest told me he would hold he’s own local requiem mass of sorts for him, I literally explained to him that Bergoglio would go down as the biggest heretic amongst the previous 37 previous anti-popes, and that the “Revolution” would only accelerate after whatever walks through that door onto the loggia.
I’ll be sure to pass this article onto all the priests I’ve been trying to help prepare and warn of what was coming over the last 15 years. None of them should be surprised, as I only knew it was coming because of Her, yet so many of Her sons refuse to see even in this 11th 12th hour
As I say to all when I elaborate, pray and prepare and be certain if you know the Synod and its fruits are wrong, know that you’re on the right side and being inspired by Jesus Christ & His Mother. I’m sure all who read this Sub stack know this, but it’s very sad how many who receive Our Lord weekly don’t
Good thing for us thst the Cardinals in the May 7-8 Conclave violated papal election law by having 13 illegal electors who were not permitted to take part in the election and therefore Robert Prevost is not the pope. If you actually want to solve these problems THAT is what you should be reporting on.
Thank you for repeating this Eric. I join my voice to yours. Things are going to get exponentially worse if Prevosts election is not declared invalid and true Catholic pope elected by either the Cardinals who did not vote or the faithful in the province of Rome.
Unfortunately things would have to change in a very dramatic fashion in both the Church and the world and in a way that we probably wouldn't wish to live through before any kind of popular election of a Pope would be feasible. That said however the College of Cardinals needs to be done away with.
Over the last several conclaves over a period of several decades this corrupt system of electing a pope has repeatedly given us popes who do not actually believe the Catholic religion and have done absolutely nothing to defend the Catholic people from the ravening wolves of the modern world. And now they have gotten to the point in 2025 where they are no longer even able to follow their own law and produce a valid election. So we are stuck in what will likely be a prolonged sede vacante with a fake 'pope' living in the Vatican.
The College of Cardinals and indeed the entire Cardinalate needs to be scrapped as soon as possible since it has proven itself wholly unable to fulfill its sole task which is to give the Catholic Church faithful i.e. believing men, whatever their other faults, validly elected as Roman Pontiffs.
How this will happen I have no idea, but it needs to prayed for.
Well said Eric. Thr rot in the church started in the 19th century with the infiltratiom of episcopal freemasons like Cardinal Rampolla, Secretary of State under Leo XIII, and his partner in the failed Ralliément policy Cardinal Richard de la Vergne. Interestingly enough almost all members of the St Gallen Mafia can trace their episcopal lineage back to these two.
The rot accelerated in the 20th century when their episcopal descendents came to power after the death (or murder?) of Pope Pius X, who unexpectedly died the same day as the Superior General of the Jesuits, Franz Xavier Werz, both of whom were supporters of Austro-Hungary, the only Catholic monarchy in Europe at the time. The next conclave elected Pope Benedict XVI who had been the secretary of Cardinal Rampolla during his time as nuncio to Spain 40 years earlier, and who several months after being elected made declarations in favour of the independence of Poland, which planted the seed for the dismemberment of Austro Hungary, one of the freemasonic objectives at the time. And since then, every pope has either collaborated directly or indirectly to advance the plan of the Alta Vendita. All of course except two: Pope JPI who wished to get rid of episcopal freemasons in the Vatican, and Pope BXVI who began getting rid of the pedophile networks and eventually realised he was not capable of task and declared an impeded see.
We have a difference of opinion about a couple of things. I have heard a lot of rumors about Rampolla and for all I know they were all true. But I don't think that the Church got any savior with Pius X. He began the process of gutting the Church's liturgy with Divino Afflatu.
When Pius X banned priests from praying the ancient Roman Psalter as of 1 January 1913 he effectively announced to the Church's enemies that she was beginning to surrender all of the prized possessions she had inherited from antiquity.
Then came the Lateran Treaty where Pius XI claimed to renounce the Catholic Church's historic right to control over the city of Rome and its environs - which he no right to do. Rome was not the Pope's personal property; it belongs to the entirety of the Catholic Church since it was bought by the blood of her martyrs. The popes merely held it in custody for the Church as a whole. They had no right to surrender it.
Then came Pius XII doing twelve million little things to break up the ancient customs of the Mass and the Office. And then John XXIII and Paul VI and the complete abandonment of not only the ancient Roman liturgy but the casting aside of the Roman Faith. And now we have this farce with some dude from Chi-town claiming to be pope.
The fact is large swathes of the Clergy have lost their way (Germany anyone?). Synodality is something that the modernists champion but it is something that can be turned against them.
It really gets under my skin to hear certain vocal North American clergy blame "the German Bishops" for 'forcing' the Vatican to 'accomodate' their demands for 'change'. To me it appears more that Rome has done exactly what it wanted to synodally, and has done absolutely nothing to rein in supposed 'bad boy behavior' on the part of "the German bishops". On the contrary, Rome seems very content to allow "the German bishops" to appear to take the lead and thereby take the heavy criticism up front; criticism that is really owed to the Vatican itself. A convenient scapegoat.
That and their proclamation and defense of all the sins that cry to God for vengeance are not sins at all. What bishop did not willingly shut down the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the reception of all the Sacraments when Ceasar demanded such during the satanic plandemic fraud? Think about that? How did Ceasar do it? He just had to imply that the spigot of usurious gains, stolen from taxpayers, would be cut off. What does that tell us when bishops choose the money over prison? Complete and total apostates, each and everyone.
Once you do that and open the door on sin it is the squatter it is very hard to get to leave. No wonder the Adversary is running riot sowing division and chaos - they let him in.
The traditionalists who believe that a Latin liturgy would solve everything essentially view the liturgy as magic. The idea of “save the liturgy, save the church” is more of the same same. It’s not magic and never was intended to be.
No liturgy, no matter how traditional nor reverently said, can’t take the place of an individual’s responsibility before
God. If that’s true for the laity, how much more true is that for cleric and prelates , and even more so for a pope?
when I was in the Episcopal Church, I noted that the liberals LOVED the pretty outfits, the smoke and the music, while prancing about the altar. But they didn't love or know Jesus. They loved themselves.
I agree with this comment so far as one only needs to attend my SSPX Mass to see it filled with modernist. And any legit traditionalist knows that to live the authentic Catholic faith requires more than just attending a LM. It is an interior disposition that rejects the world and all its pomps and submits to our Lords will above all else. Few can do this today because we are all infected to some degree with modernism. Especially addicted to comfort. But to downgrade the necessity of Mass would be a slap in the face to our Lord who instituted it.
If you're referring to my comment, my intent wasn't to disparage the Mass (regardless of how it's celebrated) but to call attention to the unreasonable expectations many traditionalists have concerning how it can influence human behavior.
I do believe it can convert and influence but I also see first hand that it is not currently taking place as much as you would think it is. So called traditionalist look nothing like the early Christian’s, we lack the faith and charity. Myself included.
This comment is ignorant of the Catholic Church Catechism itself: 1107 says: "The Holy Spirit's transforming power in the liturgy hastens the coming of the Kingdom and consummation of the mystery of salvation".
1108 says: "The most intimate co-operation of the Holy Spirit and the Church is achieved in the liturgy"
1136 says: "Liturgy is an 'action' of the whole Christ (Christus totus)"
1140 says: "Therefore liturgical services pertain to the whole Body of the Church. They manifest it, and have effects upon it".
They think that way because that is what the CCC says.
Well, as I said in another post concerning this article, the CCC also banned capital Punishment under any and all circumstances, thanks to JP II’s, Ratzinger’s (as head of CDF) and Francis’ rhetorical manipulation that contradicts centuries of teaching from both scripture and tradition.
If the CCC can be manipulated to be nothing more than a propaganda device for people, agendas, then Catholicism’s fundamental credibility is tarnished, if not destroyed outright.
And if you’re going to tell me that the liturgy is far more important than the divine command (Genesis 9: 5-6) to execute murderers under due process, thus protecting the innocent, then your moral compass needs to be recalculated.
Joseph, pump the brakes, the Divine Liturgy/Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is the Sacrament by which the Holy Spirit communicates to souls the graces necessary to discern in what circumstance the death penalty is not a violation of God's Laws. Otherwise the tyrant would be justified in the administration of the death penalty to those who oppose him as a threat to his authority.
Agree with you about capital punishment which I support as being correct and Scriptural for the crime of murder. However, you are wrong to dismiss its insights here because of the Church in Heaven which the liturgy provides a living link too and that has now been ruptured and is the result of the Churches crumbling - the liturgy is not ‘magical’ but it is supernatural.
Joseph D'Hippolito - I don't think anyone really believes that restoring the liturgy will automatically fix all problems without anything else being done. If anything, I've seen more of the opposite: people arguing that constantly hammering others over the head with more words on a page about doctrine will automatically lead to the liturgy being fixed somewhere down the line. Those people have it backwards. The maxim is lex orandi, lex credendi.
How we pray, especially during public liturgy, influences what we believe, and symbols and rituals speak just as loudly if not more so than words to human creatures who are, by definition, the union of soul and BODY. Knowledge comes through the senses. The restoration of good liturgy leads to more people possessing theological clarity. And while theological knowledge won't automatically send you to heaven, the intellect does precede the will, and we need to KNOW what it means to love God first before we can actually love Him through the will.
So while better liturgy won't automatically eliminate all the other problems we're dealing with or send people to heaven without them taking responsibility for their own actions, it is a necessary first step. And what discourse on this topic often ignores is that the promotion of good liturgy is a good in itself, and that the graces from a single Mass may be applied to the souls of people who weren't even present at that particular Mass.
In a way 'yes' and in a way 'no'? There is definitely power in the TLM that's missing from the NO. And, human freedom can still screw things up.
Even if the NO is the mass and makes grace ontologically present (and I think it is and does), its attending structures (1) dispose you such that you are disinclined to receive them. It also (2) includes some negative psychological conditioning. I think this is behavior by design.
But, the goal of the TLM is the salvation of your soul, so it disposes you to receive those graces and conditions you psychologically in a positive way. So, we really need the TLM because we need grace in our souls and the eyes of faith.
That said, I have all these supports available to me and I still land in the confessional.
To my mind, the sacrifice of the Mass is to sustain us on our journey, our pilgrimage through this life, Jesus is the living bread, the manna and we are the Israelis making our way through the desert of this life. The manna, our Lords Body is to give us the strength to endure in faith until the end, not an instant panacea for all of our broken, fallen, nature.
As several people have pointed out, revolutions eat their children. Plenty of the ardent French Revolutionaries ended up on the guillotine. And plenty of fervent Russian Revolutionaries found themselves with one way tickets to Siberia if they couldn't keep up with the latest switch in the Party Line.
I encourage everyone to support the SAVE ROME project. Since the cardinals failed in their duty to elect a Catholic pope, according to the Pope Nicolas II’s Bull In Nome Domine, in cases where the election is not pure, sincere and free, the faithful of Rome have the right to assemble and elect a Catholic pope, just as was done in the first millenium.
Yes John, I agree with you wholeheartedly. It is Catholic Action, and the only one being promulgated. I would submit that the Holy Spirit is leading us there. Maybe the 100 year warning that Our Blessed Lord told to Sister Lucia at Tuy where she was a nun in 1931, is actually an act of God to wipe out the filth at Rome. Rome will be destroyed. Maybe then the Assembly could take place and elect the true pope. I also wonder if Rome in the La Selected prophecy also refers to the satanic anglo American empire. Who knows?
"It avoids dogmatic confrontation while fostering systemic erosion." The United Methodist liberals did the same. Leaving alone the 'Book of Discipline', they nevertheless effected doctrinal change that went way to the left, so much so, that a split eventually occurred.
Pantheism and pantheists in Catholic clothes. Welcome to the church of flip-flops and beach towels. This is nauseating. Nothing scares me more than the ease by which/witch these people commit Sacrilege and Blasphemy. Anyone still believe there is good will involved here? If you do you need to become aware of the doctrine by which Our Lord corrects every man of the errors he holds, either humana modo, or not forseeing that, by direct Divine Illumination, elevated the the office of being a successor to the Apostle, i.e., a bishop before he takes his see. NO ONE WANTS TO TOUCH THIS TEACHING, NO ONE. To a man they are not of good will!
As I've stated in my previous comment; 'This is the ape of the catholic church,' NOT the Roman Catholic Church Christ founded. I believe us, 'the REMNANT' will go underground like the Remnant True Catholic's in Communist China. Sure, there are good pockets of good solid Roman Catholics all over the world but, is it too late? Are we at the cusp of a 'New Era?' New World Order? Nevertheless, we continue on with our Roman Catholic Faith that Jesus Christ founded. And if they do away with her, we go underground, like our True brother's/sister's in Christ in China who celebrate underground. But no matter what happens, we have to remain Faithful to Christ to the very End as St. Paul states; 'Only those who remain Faithful to the very End, will be in Glory.
Vatican I is false. The monarchal papacy has no warrant from Scripture or the early Church. The Pope was 'first among equals'. That's all. Jorge B PROVES the current model is false. And there is NO way to impeach a tyrant or a heretic.
The Vatican II Novus Ordo is an antichurch with an antipope. Find an SSPX chapel or a CMRI chapel to receive the sacraments. Otherwise, stay home, watch a TLM on TV, and make a spiritual Holy Communion.
First CMRI are outside the Church as you have to submit to the pope to be saved. What is so special about the SSPX? They hoisted thei petard on the Latin Mass, then caved into the antipope and pope usurper Cardinal Prevost, oh and told their parishoners to accept the vax. Yeah!
I have been to numerous novus ordo churches in order to fulfil my Sunday obligation where I have found many devout good catholics despite the poverty of the rite, which only goes to prove that Christ protects his flock.
So Paul, if you have to submit to the pope to be saved, and the pope is an apostate, doesn’t that make you an apostate? If a pope will not submit to Christ, why submit to a pope?
God gave you the ability to think critically, one of the most impotant attributes that seperate us from the animal kingdom. Of course you don't submit to an apostate pope - Francis anyone? the usurper pope Cardinal Prevost - because the law has not been observed in both cases. In the case of Francis who was an antipope all the time until Benedict died. Benedict, deliberately or otherwise, failed to renounce the papacy as prescribed in Canon Law 332§2; the cardinals were remiss in not questioning him about what his intentions were, so they rushed to conclave and falsely elected Bergoglio. That great trad hope, Burke, who served as the Prefect of the Apostolic Signature, should really have known that Benedict didn't renounce the papacy according to canon law. Why the silence?
There are countless times throughout history where popes have spoken or acted erroneously, in those cases wise Catholics knew their faith and didn't give assent to them. We are taught not to obey the popes in everything, but only in the things which correspond to faith and truth. Maybe there is a reason in the chaplet to St Michael in the chaplet about principalities, that we are taught 'may the Lord fill us with a true spirit of obedience'.
because you'll go to hell (won't pass 'go', won't collect 200 dollars)if you don't.
“They hoisted thei petard on the Latin Mass”
Can you translate this please.
They hoisted their petard on the Latin Mass. Like all trads, we have exhausted far too much time on the aberrations of the New Mass and not seen how a wolf has entered the sheepfold. Even The Remnant wont allow discussion on the failed abdication of Benedict, or the anti-papacy of Bergoglio, let alone the errors in the election of Prevost. Recognise and Resist but please don't try and change the situation.
I'm afraid the SSPX are pretty infiltrated too. They are running interference for Pope Bob.
if that is true, the. Vatican I has been proven false and therefore Papism is a false religion.
Was that a driveby comment? Throw it out of the window and you're off. No argument, no submission of evidence.
Actually, the evidence was there before Leo ever became pope. That evidence was JPII’s and Ratzinger‘s arbitrary, unilateral, theological, revisionism concerning capital punishment for murder, which contradicted centuries of teaching from both scripture and tradition. It also turned the catechism into nothing more than a propaganda tool for papal agendas. Leo’s move here reeks of that.
If a magisterium has no more value than the Ministry of Truth in Orwell’s 1984, then Catholicism’s fundamental integrity is destroyed.
I actually wrote about this years ago for a Catholic publication:
https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/3460-killing-capital-punishment-how-pope-john-paul-set-precedent-for-pope-francis
https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/4010-changing-doctrine-pope-francis-vs-cardinal-john-henry-newman
False. The papacy is not a fake pope.
Vatican I is false. The monarchal papacy has no warrant from Scripture or the early Church. The Pope was 'first among equals'. That's all. Jorge B PROVES the current model is false. And there is NO way to impeach a tyrant or a heretic.
Look at the First Council of Jerusalem, where Peter laid down the law to the assembly. Nobody contradicted him, nobody tried to get him to change his mind, because they knew he was the pope. It was the first exercise of papal infallibility, no first among equals, and it saved the Church.
Glory to Jesus Christ!
Don't forget Byzantine! No doubts about the validity of the Sacraments there at all.
Absolutely!
If Moses had been synodal, the people would have had their golden calf. I wonder what our golden calf will be? I bet something rainbow colored.
The Golden Calf is the New Mass, the Abomination of Desolation spoken of by Daniel the Prophet.
Maybe a rainbow calf?
I wish I could ask a synodal question.
How does this new model save souls and get them to heaven?
(I can just imagine the word salad answer to that question.)
"Dialogue, process, and popular piety weaponized as pseudo-magisterium." The Universal Ordinary Magisterium is infallible. If something promulgated from a purported pope is promulgated by the majority (moral unanimity) of bishops it enjoys the protection of the Holy Ghost to be error free. V2 is what it looks and sounds like - a new religion.
I think the Trinitarians did _not_ have a majority for quite some time during the Arian Controversy and the pope was not super helpful during this time. It was a floundering moment that rhymes with the present.
"It is simply not true, historically, that the pope and the entire hierarchy stopped teaching Catholic doctrine. The popes never taught heresy or anything close to it. The bishops who taught heresy were Arian bishops, who were intruders appointed not by popes but by emperors. Catholic bishops were deprived of their sees and sent into exile. It is furthermore true that the problem was not universal. The West was not nearly as much affected by the heresy as the East. There are, as well, some fine examples of popes during that fourth-century period who unwaveringly taught Catholic doctrine.
Some bring up the case of Pope Liberius who allegedly signed an ambiguous formula of a council. It is not even certain that he did sign it, but what is certain is that he did not teach it as Catholic doctrine. Consequently the worst that could be said of Liberius is that he fell personally into heresy, but it cannot be asserted that he taught it to the Church. This is a critical point.
Even this fall, however, is doubtful, for upon his return to Rome from exile, he was hailed as a great hero of the Faith. This was the same Rome which refused the emperor’s appointee to replace Liberius, whose name was Felix. The Roman Catholics refused him, not because he was an Arian, but because he was in communion with the Arians. Consequently, they never would have hailed Liberius if he had truly fallen.
https://inveritateblog.com/2019/03/26/suspended-magisterium/
Thanks for sharing. Too bad the author doesn't provide his sources. I would read them. This seems to me the most useful historical analog for the present.
I saw the phrase "participatory bodies" and with my old eyes I thought it said "participatory HODIES." That makes about as much sense, and maybe Leo is bringing Latin back.
I am going to visit my parish synod and point out that THE NEW SPRINGTIME OF VATICAN II and the MOVEMENTS OF THE SPIRIT, using THE NEW EVANGELIZATION under the guidance of SYNODALITY, will being about the NEW ADVENT leading to THE CIVILIZATION OF LOVE. I hope to drown them in their own bullshit.
Great article to summarise what every faithful priest needs to know, as the persecution of all who reject what is proposed is not far away. The fork in the pathway ahead for all of them will challenge their faithfulness to Christ.
Not that long ago many would still have faithful sensibilities to fall back on, with the ability to say these guidelines and proposals constitutes a schism, but sadly after over a decade of conditioning, many priests fail to see hiding behind the false notion of “obedience”. Many have been stripped of their discerning faculties through prolonged lukewarmness, many now unable to fight for the Truth in and of Christ. Or so it would seem. I pray many now see the need to stand ip and be countered against this centuries coming “Revolution in Rome”
On the day of Bergoglio’s death after a local priest told me he would hold he’s own local requiem mass of sorts for him, I literally explained to him that Bergoglio would go down as the biggest heretic amongst the previous 37 previous anti-popes, and that the “Revolution” would only accelerate after whatever walks through that door onto the loggia.
I’ll be sure to pass this article onto all the priests I’ve been trying to help prepare and warn of what was coming over the last 15 years. None of them should be surprised, as I only knew it was coming because of Her, yet so many of Her sons refuse to see even in this 11th 12th hour
As I say to all when I elaborate, pray and prepare and be certain if you know the Synod and its fruits are wrong, know that you’re on the right side and being inspired by Jesus Christ & His Mother. I’m sure all who read this Sub stack know this, but it’s very sad how many who receive Our Lord weekly don’t
Good thing for us thst the Cardinals in the May 7-8 Conclave violated papal election law by having 13 illegal electors who were not permitted to take part in the election and therefore Robert Prevost is not the pope. If you actually want to solve these problems THAT is what you should be reporting on.
Thank you for repeating this Eric. I join my voice to yours. Things are going to get exponentially worse if Prevosts election is not declared invalid and true Catholic pope elected by either the Cardinals who did not vote or the faithful in the province of Rome.
Unfortunately things would have to change in a very dramatic fashion in both the Church and the world and in a way that we probably wouldn't wish to live through before any kind of popular election of a Pope would be feasible. That said however the College of Cardinals needs to be done away with.
Over the last several conclaves over a period of several decades this corrupt system of electing a pope has repeatedly given us popes who do not actually believe the Catholic religion and have done absolutely nothing to defend the Catholic people from the ravening wolves of the modern world. And now they have gotten to the point in 2025 where they are no longer even able to follow their own law and produce a valid election. So we are stuck in what will likely be a prolonged sede vacante with a fake 'pope' living in the Vatican.
The College of Cardinals and indeed the entire Cardinalate needs to be scrapped as soon as possible since it has proven itself wholly unable to fulfill its sole task which is to give the Catholic Church faithful i.e. believing men, whatever their other faults, validly elected as Roman Pontiffs.
How this will happen I have no idea, but it needs to prayed for.
Well said Eric. Thr rot in the church started in the 19th century with the infiltratiom of episcopal freemasons like Cardinal Rampolla, Secretary of State under Leo XIII, and his partner in the failed Ralliément policy Cardinal Richard de la Vergne. Interestingly enough almost all members of the St Gallen Mafia can trace their episcopal lineage back to these two.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Qvu9Z_rMTMI&pp=0gcJCcEJAYcqIYzv
The rot accelerated in the 20th century when their episcopal descendents came to power after the death (or murder?) of Pope Pius X, who unexpectedly died the same day as the Superior General of the Jesuits, Franz Xavier Werz, both of whom were supporters of Austro-Hungary, the only Catholic monarchy in Europe at the time. The next conclave elected Pope Benedict XVI who had been the secretary of Cardinal Rampolla during his time as nuncio to Spain 40 years earlier, and who several months after being elected made declarations in favour of the independence of Poland, which planted the seed for the dismemberment of Austro Hungary, one of the freemasonic objectives at the time. And since then, every pope has either collaborated directly or indirectly to advance the plan of the Alta Vendita. All of course except two: Pope JPI who wished to get rid of episcopal freemasons in the Vatican, and Pope BXVI who began getting rid of the pedophile networks and eventually realised he was not capable of task and declared an impeded see.
https://www.fromrome.info/2020/12/06/at-fatima-our-lady-was-on-a-celestial-diplomatic-mission-of-utmost-important/
We have a difference of opinion about a couple of things. I have heard a lot of rumors about Rampolla and for all I know they were all true. But I don't think that the Church got any savior with Pius X. He began the process of gutting the Church's liturgy with Divino Afflatu.
When Pius X banned priests from praying the ancient Roman Psalter as of 1 January 1913 he effectively announced to the Church's enemies that she was beginning to surrender all of the prized possessions she had inherited from antiquity.
Then came the Lateran Treaty where Pius XI claimed to renounce the Catholic Church's historic right to control over the city of Rome and its environs - which he no right to do. Rome was not the Pope's personal property; it belongs to the entirety of the Catholic Church since it was bought by the blood of her martyrs. The popes merely held it in custody for the Church as a whole. They had no right to surrender it.
Then came Pius XII doing twelve million little things to break up the ancient customs of the Mass and the Office. And then John XXIII and Paul VI and the complete abandonment of not only the ancient Roman liturgy but the casting aside of the Roman Faith. And now we have this farce with some dude from Chi-town claiming to be pope.
The fact is large swathes of the Clergy have lost their way (Germany anyone?). Synodality is something that the modernists champion but it is something that can be turned against them.
The America's bishops make the Germans look like choir boys.
It really gets under my skin to hear certain vocal North American clergy blame "the German Bishops" for 'forcing' the Vatican to 'accomodate' their demands for 'change'. To me it appears more that Rome has done exactly what it wanted to synodally, and has done absolutely nothing to rein in supposed 'bad boy behavior' on the part of "the German bishops". On the contrary, Rome seems very content to allow "the German bishops" to appear to take the lead and thereby take the heavy criticism up front; criticism that is really owed to the Vatican itself. A convenient scapegoat.
But then again....they did contrive to put chickens in diapers on a stage so they aren't that great either
I can well imagine looking at their brutal suppression of the Latin Mass
That and their proclamation and defense of all the sins that cry to God for vengeance are not sins at all. What bishop did not willingly shut down the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the reception of all the Sacraments when Ceasar demanded such during the satanic plandemic fraud? Think about that? How did Ceasar do it? He just had to imply that the spigot of usurious gains, stolen from taxpayers, would be cut off. What does that tell us when bishops choose the money over prison? Complete and total apostates, each and everyone.
Once you do that and open the door on sin it is the squatter it is very hard to get to leave. No wonder the Adversary is running riot sowing division and chaos - they let him in.
Even worse, they formally invited him in and then thanked him for coming.
This is going to take a long, long time to make right and it may never be fully right again
The traditionalists who believe that a Latin liturgy would solve everything essentially view the liturgy as magic. The idea of “save the liturgy, save the church” is more of the same same. It’s not magic and never was intended to be.
No liturgy, no matter how traditional nor reverently said, can’t take the place of an individual’s responsibility before
God. If that’s true for the laity, how much more true is that for cleric and prelates , and even more so for a pope?
when I was in the Episcopal Church, I noted that the liberals LOVED the pretty outfits, the smoke and the music, while prancing about the altar. But they didn't love or know Jesus. They loved themselves.
I agree with this comment so far as one only needs to attend my SSPX Mass to see it filled with modernist. And any legit traditionalist knows that to live the authentic Catholic faith requires more than just attending a LM. It is an interior disposition that rejects the world and all its pomps and submits to our Lords will above all else. Few can do this today because we are all infected to some degree with modernism. Especially addicted to comfort. But to downgrade the necessity of Mass would be a slap in the face to our Lord who instituted it.
If you're referring to my comment, my intent wasn't to disparage the Mass (regardless of how it's celebrated) but to call attention to the unreasonable expectations many traditionalists have concerning how it can influence human behavior.
Did you watch Dr Deepstate recently?
I do believe it can convert and influence but I also see first hand that it is not currently taking place as much as you would think it is. So called traditionalist look nothing like the early Christian’s, we lack the faith and charity. Myself included.
This comment is ignorant of the Catholic Church Catechism itself: 1107 says: "The Holy Spirit's transforming power in the liturgy hastens the coming of the Kingdom and consummation of the mystery of salvation".
1108 says: "The most intimate co-operation of the Holy Spirit and the Church is achieved in the liturgy"
1136 says: "Liturgy is an 'action' of the whole Christ (Christus totus)"
1140 says: "Therefore liturgical services pertain to the whole Body of the Church. They manifest it, and have effects upon it".
They think that way because that is what the CCC says.
Well, as I said in another post concerning this article, the CCC also banned capital Punishment under any and all circumstances, thanks to JP II’s, Ratzinger’s (as head of CDF) and Francis’ rhetorical manipulation that contradicts centuries of teaching from both scripture and tradition.
If the CCC can be manipulated to be nothing more than a propaganda device for people, agendas, then Catholicism’s fundamental credibility is tarnished, if not destroyed outright.
And if you’re going to tell me that the liturgy is far more important than the divine command (Genesis 9: 5-6) to execute murderers under due process, thus protecting the innocent, then your moral compass needs to be recalculated.
Joseph, pump the brakes, the Divine Liturgy/Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is the Sacrament by which the Holy Spirit communicates to souls the graces necessary to discern in what circumstance the death penalty is not a violation of God's Laws. Otherwise the tyrant would be justified in the administration of the death penalty to those who oppose him as a threat to his authority.
Agree with you about capital punishment which I support as being correct and Scriptural for the crime of murder. However, you are wrong to dismiss its insights here because of the Church in Heaven which the liturgy provides a living link too and that has now been ruptured and is the result of the Churches crumbling - the liturgy is not ‘magical’ but it is supernatural.
Joseph D'Hippolito - I don't think anyone really believes that restoring the liturgy will automatically fix all problems without anything else being done. If anything, I've seen more of the opposite: people arguing that constantly hammering others over the head with more words on a page about doctrine will automatically lead to the liturgy being fixed somewhere down the line. Those people have it backwards. The maxim is lex orandi, lex credendi.
How we pray, especially during public liturgy, influences what we believe, and symbols and rituals speak just as loudly if not more so than words to human creatures who are, by definition, the union of soul and BODY. Knowledge comes through the senses. The restoration of good liturgy leads to more people possessing theological clarity. And while theological knowledge won't automatically send you to heaven, the intellect does precede the will, and we need to KNOW what it means to love God first before we can actually love Him through the will.
So while better liturgy won't automatically eliminate all the other problems we're dealing with or send people to heaven without them taking responsibility for their own actions, it is a necessary first step. And what discourse on this topic often ignores is that the promotion of good liturgy is a good in itself, and that the graces from a single Mass may be applied to the souls of people who weren't even present at that particular Mass.
In a way 'yes' and in a way 'no'? There is definitely power in the TLM that's missing from the NO. And, human freedom can still screw things up.
Even if the NO is the mass and makes grace ontologically present (and I think it is and does), its attending structures (1) dispose you such that you are disinclined to receive them. It also (2) includes some negative psychological conditioning. I think this is behavior by design.
But, the goal of the TLM is the salvation of your soul, so it disposes you to receive those graces and conditions you psychologically in a positive way. So, we really need the TLM because we need grace in our souls and the eyes of faith.
That said, I have all these supports available to me and I still land in the confessional.
To my mind, the sacrifice of the Mass is to sustain us on our journey, our pilgrimage through this life, Jesus is the living bread, the manna and we are the Israelis making our way through the desert of this life. The manna, our Lords Body is to give us the strength to endure in faith until the end, not an instant panacea for all of our broken, fallen, nature.
As several people have pointed out, revolutions eat their children. Plenty of the ardent French Revolutionaries ended up on the guillotine. And plenty of fervent Russian Revolutionaries found themselves with one way tickets to Siberia if they couldn't keep up with the latest switch in the Party Line.
I encourage everyone to support the SAVE ROME project. Since the cardinals failed in their duty to elect a Catholic pope, according to the Pope Nicolas II’s Bull In Nome Domine, in cases where the election is not pure, sincere and free, the faithful of Rome have the right to assemble and elect a Catholic pope, just as was done in the first millenium.
https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/01/project-save-rome/
https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/11/pope-nicholas-iii-infallibly-taught-that-faithful-can-elect-a-catholic-pope/
Yes John, I agree with you wholeheartedly. It is Catholic Action, and the only one being promulgated. I would submit that the Holy Spirit is leading us there. Maybe the 100 year warning that Our Blessed Lord told to Sister Lucia at Tuy where she was a nun in 1931, is actually an act of God to wipe out the filth at Rome. Rome will be destroyed. Maybe then the Assembly could take place and elect the true pope. I also wonder if Rome in the La Selected prophecy also refers to the satanic anglo American empire. Who knows?
I know that Cor Orans will be repealed Any. Day. Now. Right? Right???
"It avoids dogmatic confrontation while fostering systemic erosion." The United Methodist liberals did the same. Leaving alone the 'Book of Discipline', they nevertheless effected doctrinal change that went way to the left, so much so, that a split eventually occurred.
Pantheism and pantheists in Catholic clothes. Welcome to the church of flip-flops and beach towels. This is nauseating. Nothing scares me more than the ease by which/witch these people commit Sacrilege and Blasphemy. Anyone still believe there is good will involved here? If you do you need to become aware of the doctrine by which Our Lord corrects every man of the errors he holds, either humana modo, or not forseeing that, by direct Divine Illumination, elevated the the office of being a successor to the Apostle, i.e., a bishop before he takes his see. NO ONE WANTS TO TOUCH THIS TEACHING, NO ONE. To a man they are not of good will!
As I've stated in my previous comment; 'This is the ape of the catholic church,' NOT the Roman Catholic Church Christ founded. I believe us, 'the REMNANT' will go underground like the Remnant True Catholic's in Communist China. Sure, there are good pockets of good solid Roman Catholics all over the world but, is it too late? Are we at the cusp of a 'New Era?' New World Order? Nevertheless, we continue on with our Roman Catholic Faith that Jesus Christ founded. And if they do away with her, we go underground, like our True brother's/sister's in Christ in China who celebrate underground. But no matter what happens, we have to remain Faithful to Christ to the very End as St. Paul states; 'Only those who remain Faithful to the very End, will be in Glory.
in nomine patri.
Jesus Christ!!Please come quickly!!
Vatican I is false. The monarchal papacy has no warrant from Scripture or the early Church. The Pope was 'first among equals'. That's all. Jorge B PROVES the current model is false. And there is NO way to impeach a tyrant or a heretic.
Communists and the demon they worship never sleep.