Tucho Demotes Doctrine While Baggio Decentralizes the Church

Fernández and Baggio try to sell the Revolution as “mission,” with Leo XIV as the brand refresh

Rome dates its propaganda with charming precision. January 8, 2026. Two curial pieces, two polished smiles, one message: the postconciliar project lives; it merely changes its wardrobe. Leo XIV “asks us to reread” Evangelii gaudium and the machine obediently hums. Fernández offers the theological perfume, Baggio provides the managerial blueprint. Together they perform the same trick the system has performed for sixty years: reduce the Catholic faith to a warm nucleus, demote everything that makes it Catholic to “secondary,” then call the demolition “reform,” “listening,” and “mission.”

They claim to be rescuing the heart of the Gospel. They are, in fact, burying it under a therapeutic slogan, a sociological program, and a bureaucracy trained to treat dogma as clutter.

Fernández’s Sales Pitch: “Not an obsessive proclamation of doctrines and norms” means the end of preaching as the Church understood it

Fernández begins with an order: reread Evangelii gaudium, as though a document’s relevance is created by papal fiat rather than by fidelity to what Christ handed down. He insists it “did not expire,” and then reveals why. The text functions as a permanent solvent. It dissolves the Catholic religion into a “kerygma” narrowly defined, emotionally framed, and strategically insulated from the “doctrines and norms” that the Church once preached as the very shape of the Gospel in history.

He quotes the key line with pride: the exhortation is “not concerned with an obsessive proclamation of all the doctrines and norms of the Church.” That phrase is a confession. In the old world, the Church taught doctrine because souls must know what God has revealed, what the Church infallibly proposes, what sin is, what grace is, what judgment is, what the sacraments do, what the Cross demands, what the commandments bind, what damnation means. The new world hears “doctrines and norms” and reaches for the fainting couch. The physician becomes the villain, the disease becomes “complexity,” and the cure becomes “simplification.”

Fernández calls the kerygma “the beauty of the saving love of God,” and then immediately treats “beauty” as a delivery problem. “Creativity is required.” The message must be made “attractive.” The faithful must “admire” it. The audience must “feel attracted.” This is advertising language stapled onto theology. It turns preaching into branding and the pulpit into a marketing department.

The old Church preached Christ crucified, the scandal and the sword, the narrow gate, the necessity of conversion, the fear of the Lord that begins wisdom, the demand for repentance, restitution, obedience, fidelity, mortification, and the supernatural life. Fernández offers a smoother product: “Jesus Christ loves you… he is living at your side every day to enlighten, strengthen and free you.” The line itself sounds harmless. In his hands it becomes a substitute, a universal greeting card designed to survive contact with any lifestyle, any moral disorder, any doctrinal confusion, any liturgical vandalism. It can be preached in every key because it binds you to nothing concrete.

Then comes the real poison: “not all the truths of the doctrine of the Church have the same importance.” Catholics have always distinguished between levels of doctrine in a precise way, rooted in the object revealed and the authority proposing it. Fernández uses the idea as a crowbar. He turns “order” into “optional.” He makes the “heart” into an excuse to treat everything else as disposable packaging.

Once that move is made, everything follows with bureaucratic inevitability. “Ecclesia semper reformanda,” he declares, as if the Church were a start up that needs continuous retooling. The constant motion is the point. Permanent reform means permanent instability, permanent revision, permanent downgrading of what resists the new priorities. He openly states the operational rule: put in “second place what does not serve directly to reach everyone with this first announcement.” Second place becomes third, then forgotten, then treated as a pathology. That is how doctrine becomes an embarrassment, moral law becomes “obsession,” and worship becomes a stage where the audience must “feel attracted.”

He ties the whole thing to “social engagement” so the Gospel is not “disfigured.” Notice the inversion. The Gospel is disfigured by sin, by heresy, by sacrilege, by false worship, by contempt for dogma, by refusal of repentance. In Fernández’s frame, the disfigurement comes from insufficient social programming and inadequate therapeutic tone. The result is predictable: the supernatural is subordinated to activism, and the Cross is treated as a motivational symbol for “human promotion.”

Then he finishes with the spiritual garnish: “missionary spirit,” “enthusiasm,” “audacity,” fruit “beyond what we can verify.” A mist of uplifting language that asks nothing definite and condemns nothing definite. The saints had fire because they believed definite truths, fought definite errors, named definite sins, endured definite persecutions, and sought a definite crown. Fernández offers ardor without clarity, zeal without doctrine, mission without conversion.

The Fernández Method: Make doctrine look “obsessive,” make moral law look “buried,” make the Church sound Protestant

The technique is simple. First, treat dogma and moral law as a heap of “themes” that distract from the “central announcement.” Second, replace the concrete content of Catholic preaching with a thin proclamation that can be shared with modernity without conflict. Third, call resistance “fear,” call precision “rigidity,” call catechesis “obsession,” call discipline “lack of attractiveness.” Fourth, insist that Leo XIV merely adds “changes” while keeping the engine running. That is the entire point of invoking Evangelii gaudium on January 8, 2026: Leo XIV inherits Francis’s architecture and asks the curia to stop pretending otherwise.

Baggio’s Blueprint

Praedicate Evangelium: Turns Rome into a listening center, bishops into managers, synodality into doctrine by process

Baggio’s piece is what happens when the same theology is translated into institutional design. He begins with the truism that the Church must announce the Gospel, then defines the Gospel’s announcement as a “missionary conversion” that ensures fidelity to being “light,” then slips in the real aim: “a renewed exercise of aggiornamento begun by the Second Vatican Council.” There it is, in plain language. The Council remains the revolution’s legal foundation. The curia is being remodeled to serve it more “effectively.”

He binds mission to “communion,” then defines communion in the postconciliar key: the Church imitating the Trinity through “communion ad intra” and “mission ad extra.” The phrase sounds lofty. It functions as a justification for flattening authority. The Trinity becomes a rhetorical prop for a program of processes, assemblies, reciprocal listening, and “walking together,” which is bureaucratic romanticism posing as theology.

Baggio admits that Praedicate Evangelium introduces “many novel elements.” He treats novelty as a feature. In the Catholic world before the rupture, novelty in ecclesiology and governance raised alarms, because novelty tends to mean discontinuity with what the Church has already judged, taught, and embodied through centuries. Here novelty is celebrated as evidence that the reform is alive.

He highlights three pillars.

The first is “double service”: the curia serves the Pope, and also serves the bishops. The old truth remains, the Pope possesses supreme jurisdiction and the curia is his instrument. The new emphasis is the curia as a service platform for episcopal conferences, regional groupings, and continental structures. Power migrates from clear lines of authority into networks and committees. Responsibility diffuses; accountability evaporates.

The second is decentralization: Rome should not “take the place” of local bishops on issues arising in their territories. In a sane Catholic frame, subsidiarity has boundaries and Rome guards unity of doctrine, discipline, and worship. In the postconciliar frame, decentralization becomes a mechanism to allow experiments everywhere while keeping a vague “communion” as a symbolic umbrella. One diocese blesses what another condemns, one conference “discerns” what another refuses, and the faithful are told that diversity is the Spirit. Rome then appoints judges and issues procedural texts to manage the chaos it created, while claiming that it has empowered local pastors.

The third is synodality, defined as reciprocal listening and walking together. He quotes the familiar catechism of the new regime: faithful, bishops, Bishop of Rome, all listening to each other, all listening to the Spirit. The practical effect is a doctrine of process. Truth becomes what the process produces. Authority becomes the ability to convene, facilitate, and ratify a consensus. The curia becomes a set of “centers of listening” tuned to “frequencies,” like a customer service department.

This is the managerial church: a curia designed for consultation, messaging, safeguarding initiatives, social goals, and “human family, unity and peace.” Everything is framed in horizontal terms. The supernatural is mentioned, then immediately routed into a program. The deposit of faith becomes content management.

The Shared Lie; They talk like missionaries while they dismantle the Catholic structure that makes mission possible

Both texts use the same camouflage. They speak constantly about mission, proclamation, fervor, evangelization. They avoid the Catholic essentials that convert sinners and preserve the faithful: precise doctrine, clear condemnation of error, the fear of God, the necessity of sacramental confession, the objective moral law, the reality of mortal sin, the uniqueness of the true Church, the obligation to submit to the faith entire, the sacred liturgy as worship offered to God rather than a platform for community feelings.

Fernández explicitly treats “doctrines and norms” as the problem. Baggio explicitly celebrates aggiornamento and novelty. Both rely on the postconciliar habit of using grand words that once meant something definite, then emptying them until they mean whatever the program requires.

Mission becomes activism. Communion becomes consensus. Reform becomes perpetual revision. Listening becomes authority. Beauty becomes marketing. Kerygma becomes a slogan that survives contact with modernity by abandoning the sharp edges of Catholic truth.

What This Looks Like on the Ground: “Second place” is where the faith goes to die

When a cardinal says the Church must put in “second place” what does not directly serve this simplified proclamation, he is announcing a hierarchy of priorities that always ends the same way. Catechesis shrinks. Doctrine becomes optional. Moral teaching becomes “accompaniment.” Liturgy becomes “style.” Discipline becomes “rigidity.” The saints become inspirational content. The faithful become customers. Priests become facilitators. Bishops become administrators. Rome becomes a service provider managing a global franchise.

In that environment, the most “forceful and convincing” message wins, because the measure is effect. The Church’s measure was never effect. The Church’s measure is truth, fidelity, sanctity, sacrifice, and continuity with what has been received. A message that is “convincing” yet detached from the full Catholic faith convinces people into a vague religiosity that cannot withstand temptation, suffering, or death.

The Preconciliar Answer: The Gospel is not a core plus optional extras; it is a complete religion with dogma, worship, sacraments, and law

The Gospel includes the kerygma, and it includes everything Christ commanded to be taught and observed. The Church did not become “obsessive” when she taught doctrine and enforced discipline. She acted as a mother who knows that love without truth is sentimentality, and truth without love is cruelty. The old preaching held them together by preaching the full Christ: King, Judge, Redeemer, Lawgiver, Victim, Priest.

Fernández wants proclamation without “obsession” over doctrine and norms. Baggio wants governance through aggiornamento, decentralization, and synodal process. January 8, 2026 stamps the continuity: Leo XIV, Francis’s structure, Francis’s vocabulary, Francis’s priorities, now carried forward by the very men who embody the postconciliar method.

The faithful are not obligated to applaud the machine that devours their inheritance. The old Catholic instinct remains correct: when “mission” is used to demote doctrine, the mission has already been betrayed.

If you want to answer this curial catechism, do it the way Catholics once did. Read the Council of Trent, not the latest exhortation. Read Pascendi, not the latest “listening process.” Read the Roman Catechism, not marketing copy about attractiveness. Return to the Mass that forms Catholics who can endure hardship without needing the Church to entertain them. Confess, fast, pray, teach your children the faith in full, and stop letting Rome’s managers redefine the terms.

They call it rereading. It reads like surrender.

---

If you value independent Catholic analysis and want to help keep this work going, you can make a contribution or subscribe below. Every donation and subscription directly supports the writing, research, and production of Hiraeth in Exile.

Thank you for helping preserve independent Catholic journalism rooted in truth and tradition.