Before the very statue of Our Lady of Fatima, Leo refused to name Fatima, the Miracle of the Sun, the warnings of Hell, the consecration, or the Third Secret still buried in the Vatican vaults.
On the other hand, they adopted the French Revolution's revolutionary methods and phrase "equality, liberty, and fraternity" which has also followed them into misfortune and worse, apostasy.
We're focusing way too much on how the French Revolution ended up. How it was co-opted and turned against the very Third Estate it was supposed to make remedy for.
Let us not forget the underlying causes that made La Terreur necessary. The original royal rot was so bad that anything was looking good in comparison. Something drastic had to be done as the system was incapable of reforming itself. So, the French Revolution's reaction to the original cause was right and just. That it was hijacked and turned into an instrument of Jacobin social engineering was the fault of those involved.
Rome does not want the truth of the third secret to become public because it would out them as the instruments of apostacy that they, the false hierarchy have corrupted the church for 60yrs.
The message of Fatima is also for all Catholics who must pray the Rosary daily, consecrate themselves to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, do the first Saturdays reparations for blasphems against her Immaculate Heart, and do penance. Most Catholics don't do that, including traditional Catholics. Therefore, we are being punished with terrible popes and a rotten hierarchy. We are all responsible for the great apostasy which started at the top, but it has now spread everywhere in the Church.
You cannot possibly know that most Catholics do not pray the Rosary daily, have consecrated themselves to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, do the first Saturday reparations and do penance and I would argue that because there are enough of us, God's wrath has been tempered to give more time for those who dying in sins to see the light and come into the true Catholic Church before it is too late.
Keep going in circles. The church's decline has been going on since Reform Jews began infiltrating back in the 19th century! Pope Pius X stopped the fall and began pulling the church up from the hole it fell in. But, after Pius X died, it slowly began falling back into liberalism and modernism.
Pope John XXIII was given the task to start the demolition job but, Pope Paul VI had to finish it. The flock had nothing to do with it. This came from the top and they had no fear of the congregations who had become less than sheep.
The herd is scattered by Marianism and it's time for the rams to take charge. By the current feminized and mawkish culture of Vatican II, red-blooded rams with the spirit of the Crusades in them are scarce indeed!
Marianism is the overemphasis of a supporting character in the Bible i.e. Mother Mary. For every point in Scripture that is directly attributed to her, a thousand embellished claims are tacked on and made equal. Marianism has made the Church a totally feminized and womanish religion. Completely lacking in the masculine spirit that once led the Crusades in their Holy mission of eradicating Muslims from the “Holy Land” and purging Jewish pollution at home.
Marianism makes sheep out of men, enables women and children to rule, and the herd can only scatter due to lack of a militant and patriarchal center.
Two points. First, Modernists have no fear of chastisement because they don't believe in a chastising God. They have redefined sin and its consequences including Original Sin in sociological/psychological/philosophical terms that modern man now understands so much better than his ignorant predecessors in the Catholic faith. Therefore the message of Fatima is not believed in.
Second, I find one piece of evidence damning, among many, for the Conciliar Church. Let's call it "Man knows better than God". The Third Secret was to be revealed before 1960 and the Consecration of Russia was demanded long before that as well, neither being done. In direct opposition to the will of God the exact opposite was done at Vatican II, a refusal to condemn atheistic communism by JXXIII and his preference for dialogue, appeasement, and mercy, setting the whole ruptured train of the last 60 years in motion under the influence of marxism, modernism, pederasty, and freemasonry.
The subsequent willful refusal to follow God's dictates by JPII and BXVI despite their stated belief in Fatima and its apocalyptic message (even though a private revelation not requiring belief despite being approved by the Church) show just how embedded and committed to the false New Theology they were. But Old and New Testament history is rife with those in power both clerical and secular not following authentic prophetic messages.
Thank you for writing this piece! I have been so distressed over Leo's using Our Lady of Fatima, the very statue from the Shrine itself - which I have been privileged to visit and pray before many times - as a prop for his apostasy and heresies! Leo and all those caught up in his movement to destroy the Catholic Faith and replace it with the synodal false church are shameless -- and filled with the spirit of "anti-Christ."
I also want to post here a link to the best information we have at this point on what is really contained in the 3rd Secret of Fatima. Dr. Maike Hickson is an excellent journalist - and her reporting is totally credible.
Pat, look up 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 2314. Do NOT use the 1983 Code as it is heretical. Canon 2314 describes Catholic doctrine about heretics, even popes. The impact is that anyone, even a pope, who pertinaciously commits heresy is latae sententiae (i.e. automatically) excommunicated from the Catholic Church without need of judgment. It is a sad truth that Prevost has committed heresy more than once and continues to do so, making it pertinacious, so he is not Catholic and therefore, cannot be the Pope.
May I suggest you consider stop taking a "position" on maters of faith and morals, but instead read what the Traditional Church has declared to be the truth. Our duty as faithful Catholics is to accept all doctrines of the Traditional Catholic Faith, not to take a position on what has been declared by the Church.
That is incorrect as you may or may not know. Prophecies, not agenda driven translations, say a "man in white" will flee. If you wish to be Catholic, I urge you to please study more diligently.
I just wrote that off the top of my head because I couldn't remember the exact words and didn't feel it was a critical to look it up for a blog comment. Notice I used no quotes. Therefore, I don't think I need any scolding from you. FYI, I am Catholic, maybe not to your degree of satisfaction.
Mr. Tomassi, it was not my intent to scold you, Sir, just to provide information. In today's world of hypersensitivity, it is always a challenge to provide information, even a respectful one, in reply to a comment online, so I ask for your pardon.
I certainly don't think Leo is actually the pope. Nor were Francis, Benedict XVI, JPII, Paul VI or John XXIII. See Novusordowatch.com and click on False Popes at the top of the page for evidence of what they said and did which prove they could not possibly be the Vicar of Christ.
And to understand how the Second Vatican Council invented a new anti-Catholic religion whose foundation is the synthesis of heresies Modernism, watch the series of talks that Louie Verrachio is doing at Catholic Family Podcast as he goes through all 16 documents of the Council.
And if you haven't read the encyclicals on Modernism of Pope Pius IX and Pope St. Pius X, you really should read them. They can be found here: papalencyclicals.net
What else can we expect from Bergoglio’s protege? Francis met with Bob every Saturday morning for two years to “show him the ropes”. That’s after years of seminary training in the south side of Chicago and 20 years of liberation theology training in Peru.
Another good article. Not surprised that Leo did this, just doing what has been done in the past to one degree or another.
The quote from Mother Angelica was good to see. I hadn't heard about that until I read the book EWTN - A Network Gone Wrong by Christopher Ferrara somewhere around 2015 or 16, thereabouts.
It was particularly interesting because at the time she said that Fr. Nicholas Gruner was trying to tell people we hadn't gotten the real Third Secret and the usual "conservative catholics"" who loved to trash him (and anyone who agreed with him) with the usual "he's attacking the Pope" & "He's not obeying the Pope" & "He's schismatic" and on and on, were strangely silent about Mother Angelica's words.
Of course, had these people been consistent, they would have started condemning her, but they knew if they did, their careers would have been over. Fr. Gruner could be attacked with impunity, but Mother Angelica? Nooooooo! No way. They would've been bankrupted in 5 minutes. In any case, that was either the last or one of the last time(s) she appeared on her show. Lucky for them. But their complete and utter hypocrisy was exposed. But since they were silent, there was never a controversy about what she said. And that 'saved' them, sort of.
And this, right here, is why I argue tooth and claw against the notion of submitting prophetic utterances to the authority of at least the Councillor Church - It cannot be trusted not to act in its own self interest and cover up any revelation that might be harmful to its standing. If it is acting in its own interest, not that of God it abrogates any right to wield such authority.
Father Malachi Martin said he witnessed the opening of the Third Secret by John XXIII but only hinted at its contents over the years because of the strict vow of secrecy he was under (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3AnjIpA44I). He did say, however, that the message of Our Lady of Akita basically stated what the Third Secret said, it spoke of a great apostasy starting at the top; cardinals against cardinals and bishops against bishops; and terrible corruption and immorality. (No doubt, referring to the rampant homosexuality within the Church.) Whatever. I believe we are now living the Third Secret. May God have mercy on us all!
Don’t forget the great evils of contraception and abortion. I think sodomy is now popular among heterosexuals too. I had an arch liberal woman scream in my face that it’s not only men who like it.
“Given they follow the example of the King of France in delaying the execution of my request, they will follow him into misfortune.”
Our Lady to Sr. Lucy- 1929
On the other hand, they adopted the French Revolution's revolutionary methods and phrase "equality, liberty, and fraternity" which has also followed them into misfortune and worse, apostasy.
We're focusing way too much on how the French Revolution ended up. How it was co-opted and turned against the very Third Estate it was supposed to make remedy for.
Let us not forget the underlying causes that made La Terreur necessary. The original royal rot was so bad that anything was looking good in comparison. Something drastic had to be done as the system was incapable of reforming itself. So, the French Revolution's reaction to the original cause was right and just. That it was hijacked and turned into an instrument of Jacobin social engineering was the fault of those involved.
Rome does not want the truth of the third secret to become public because it would out them as the instruments of apostacy that they, the false hierarchy have corrupted the church for 60yrs.
Sad but true. Christe eleison!
The message of Fatima is also for all Catholics who must pray the Rosary daily, consecrate themselves to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, do the first Saturdays reparations for blasphems against her Immaculate Heart, and do penance. Most Catholics don't do that, including traditional Catholics. Therefore, we are being punished with terrible popes and a rotten hierarchy. We are all responsible for the great apostasy which started at the top, but it has now spread everywhere in the Church.
No one knows why God has allowed so many invalid popes to occupy the chair of Peter. Blaming this on the flock seems unsubstantiated.
You cannot possibly know that most Catholics do not pray the Rosary daily, have consecrated themselves to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, do the first Saturday reparations and do penance and I would argue that because there are enough of us, God's wrath has been tempered to give more time for those who dying in sins to see the light and come into the true Catholic Church before it is too late.
Ok but the Catholic circular firing squad of the Church Bickering doesn't help. The unsearchable God does it all.
Keep going in circles. The church's decline has been going on since Reform Jews began infiltrating back in the 19th century! Pope Pius X stopped the fall and began pulling the church up from the hole it fell in. But, after Pius X died, it slowly began falling back into liberalism and modernism.
Pope John XXIII was given the task to start the demolition job but, Pope Paul VI had to finish it. The flock had nothing to do with it. This came from the top and they had no fear of the congregations who had become less than sheep.
The herd is scattered by Marianism and it's time for the rams to take charge. By the current feminized and mawkish culture of Vatican II, red-blooded rams with the spirit of the Crusades in them are scarce indeed!
"The herd is scattered by Marianism". Would you care to explain this comment?
Marianism is the overemphasis of a supporting character in the Bible i.e. Mother Mary. For every point in Scripture that is directly attributed to her, a thousand embellished claims are tacked on and made equal. Marianism has made the Church a totally feminized and womanish religion. Completely lacking in the masculine spirit that once led the Crusades in their Holy mission of eradicating Muslims from the “Holy Land” and purging Jewish pollution at home.
Marianism makes sheep out of men, enables women and children to rule, and the herd can only scatter due to lack of a militant and patriarchal center.
Two points. First, Modernists have no fear of chastisement because they don't believe in a chastising God. They have redefined sin and its consequences including Original Sin in sociological/psychological/philosophical terms that modern man now understands so much better than his ignorant predecessors in the Catholic faith. Therefore the message of Fatima is not believed in.
Second, I find one piece of evidence damning, among many, for the Conciliar Church. Let's call it "Man knows better than God". The Third Secret was to be revealed before 1960 and the Consecration of Russia was demanded long before that as well, neither being done. In direct opposition to the will of God the exact opposite was done at Vatican II, a refusal to condemn atheistic communism by JXXIII and his preference for dialogue, appeasement, and mercy, setting the whole ruptured train of the last 60 years in motion under the influence of marxism, modernism, pederasty, and freemasonry.
The subsequent willful refusal to follow God's dictates by JPII and BXVI despite their stated belief in Fatima and its apocalyptic message (even though a private revelation not requiring belief despite being approved by the Church) show just how embedded and committed to the false New Theology they were. But Old and New Testament history is rife with those in power both clerical and secular not following authentic prophetic messages.
Thank you for writing this piece! I have been so distressed over Leo's using Our Lady of Fatima, the very statue from the Shrine itself - which I have been privileged to visit and pray before many times - as a prop for his apostasy and heresies! Leo and all those caught up in his movement to destroy the Catholic Faith and replace it with the synodal false church are shameless -- and filled with the spirit of "anti-Christ."
I also want to post here a link to the best information we have at this point on what is really contained in the 3rd Secret of Fatima. Dr. Maike Hickson is an excellent journalist - and her reporting is totally credible.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjA18o7RIi4
Ohhhhh my goodness!!! A million thank yous for getting the truth written down and public!!!! Your work is so appreciated!
God bless you and Mary love you always!
Blessed be Jesus Whose mother is Mary!!!
Unpardonable
Unbelievable
Disgrace
Trivialising
(And of course hell does not exist!)
Thank you for your steadfastness!
It’s a light in the depths of darkness!
and the ape of the church marches on
Pat, look up 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 2314. Do NOT use the 1983 Code as it is heretical. Canon 2314 describes Catholic doctrine about heretics, even popes. The impact is that anyone, even a pope, who pertinaciously commits heresy is latae sententiae (i.e. automatically) excommunicated from the Catholic Church without need of judgment. It is a sad truth that Prevost has committed heresy more than once and continues to do so, making it pertinacious, so he is not Catholic and therefore, cannot be the Pope.
May I suggest you consider stop taking a "position" on maters of faith and morals, but instead read what the Traditional Church has declared to be the truth. Our duty as faithful Catholics is to accept all doctrines of the Traditional Catholic Faith, not to take a position on what has been declared by the Church.
In Hoc Signo Vinces!
You should not be slow to follow truth that is manifested by reason applied to evidence.
Many prophecies say that the Pope will run from Rome and ultimately be killed. If we don't have a valid Pope, how would this prophecy take place.
That is incorrect as you may or may not know. Prophecies, not agenda driven translations, say a "man in white" will flee. If you wish to be Catholic, I urge you to please study more diligently.
I just wrote that off the top of my head because I couldn't remember the exact words and didn't feel it was a critical to look it up for a blog comment. Notice I used no quotes. Therefore, I don't think I need any scolding from you. FYI, I am Catholic, maybe not to your degree of satisfaction.
Mr. Tomassi, it was not my intent to scold you, Sir, just to provide information. In today's world of hypersensitivity, it is always a challenge to provide information, even a respectful one, in reply to a comment online, so I ask for your pardon.
Pax domini sit semper vobiscum.
You could be right or He is a false pope along with many others before him including Francis!!
I certainly don't think Leo is actually the pope. Nor were Francis, Benedict XVI, JPII, Paul VI or John XXIII. See Novusordowatch.com and click on False Popes at the top of the page for evidence of what they said and did which prove they could not possibly be the Vicar of Christ.
And to understand how the Second Vatican Council invented a new anti-Catholic religion whose foundation is the synthesis of heresies Modernism, watch the series of talks that Louie Verrachio is doing at Catholic Family Podcast as he goes through all 16 documents of the Council.
And if you haven't read the encyclicals on Modernism of Pope Pius IX and Pope St. Pius X, you really should read them. They can be found here: papalencyclicals.net
What else can we expect from Bergoglio’s protege? Francis met with Bob every Saturday morning for two years to “show him the ropes”. That’s after years of seminary training in the south side of Chicago and 20 years of liberation theology training in Peru.
And we should be surprised? He’s a n antipope. No further explanation needed.
excellent. thank you.
Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Australia.
Another good article. Not surprised that Leo did this, just doing what has been done in the past to one degree or another.
The quote from Mother Angelica was good to see. I hadn't heard about that until I read the book EWTN - A Network Gone Wrong by Christopher Ferrara somewhere around 2015 or 16, thereabouts.
It was particularly interesting because at the time she said that Fr. Nicholas Gruner was trying to tell people we hadn't gotten the real Third Secret and the usual "conservative catholics"" who loved to trash him (and anyone who agreed with him) with the usual "he's attacking the Pope" & "He's not obeying the Pope" & "He's schismatic" and on and on, were strangely silent about Mother Angelica's words.
Of course, had these people been consistent, they would have started condemning her, but they knew if they did, their careers would have been over. Fr. Gruner could be attacked with impunity, but Mother Angelica? Nooooooo! No way. They would've been bankrupted in 5 minutes. In any case, that was either the last or one of the last time(s) she appeared on her show. Lucky for them. But their complete and utter hypocrisy was exposed. But since they were silent, there was never a controversy about what she said. And that 'saved' them, sort of.
Interesting - thanks.
And this, right here, is why I argue tooth and claw against the notion of submitting prophetic utterances to the authority of at least the Councillor Church - It cannot be trusted not to act in its own self interest and cover up any revelation that might be harmful to its standing. If it is acting in its own interest, not that of God it abrogates any right to wield such authority.
Father Malachi Martin said he witnessed the opening of the Third Secret by John XXIII but only hinted at its contents over the years because of the strict vow of secrecy he was under (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3AnjIpA44I). He did say, however, that the message of Our Lady of Akita basically stated what the Third Secret said, it spoke of a great apostasy starting at the top; cardinals against cardinals and bishops against bishops; and terrible corruption and immorality. (No doubt, referring to the rampant homosexuality within the Church.) Whatever. I believe we are now living the Third Secret. May God have mercy on us all!
Don’t forget the great evils of contraception and abortion. I think sodomy is now popular among heterosexuals too. I had an arch liberal woman scream in my face that it’s not only men who like it.
…“the rubble of a synodal church that calls disobedience renewal.” - so sadly and unfortunately true!
Thanks, Chris, for your insights!!