Leo XIV Joined a Communist March Against Ronald Reagan in 1983

An Irish priest prays for Trump’s death at Mass, Abp. Vigano exposes Leo’s political operation, silence as polygamy is floated in a cathedral, and Francis’ own biographer admits Leo is Francis 2.0

The Photograph They Cannot Explain Away

Every so often a single image does the work of twenty speeches.

This week’s image was the old photograph of young Robert Prevost in 1983, marching in Comiso, Sicily, in protest against the Cruise missiles installed under Ronald Reagan. That protest was organized by the Italian Communist Party. The old photograph fits the man now sitting in Rome with unnerving precision. It looks like an early disclosure.

Plenty of men did foolish things in youth. Plenty of old photos deserve to stay old. This one does not. This one matters because the instincts visible in the background of that march have never really left the stage. The moral vocabulary may be dressed up now in ecclesiastical language. The slogans may be softened into “peace,” “dialogue,” “encounter,” and “the Gospel.” The old left-wing reflex is still there all the same. Suspicion of the West. Suspicion of political realism. Suspicion of force even in the face of aggression. Moral preening in place of judgment. Humanitarian abstraction where Catholic order should stand.

Conservatives who spent the first weeks of this pontificate soothing themselves with the thought that Leo would somehow be a corrective to Francis now have to deal with a problem they cannot laugh away. The old photo has explanatory power. It helps make sense of the present.

The Man in the Photo Is Still Running the Show

The defenders of Leo will say a photograph from 1983 proves nothing. Of course it does not prove everything. But when old facts line up neatly with present behavior, only a fool pretends the pattern means nothing.

Look at the record already forming around Leo. He speaks in the same broad humanitarian register that made Francis a darling of every secular newsroom in Europe and North America. He gives the impression of moral seriousness while dissolving distinctions that older Catholic theology insisted upon. He prefers atmospherics to definitions. He sounds “pastoral” precisely where Catholic office demands hardness, precision, and refusal. He appears brave when confronting the fashionable enemy of the day, but strangely muted when disorder, false religion, or moral confusion enter the church through the front door.

That is the Francis project with better posture.

And now even friendly observers are saying so openly.

Francis with Better Table Manners

One of the more revealing items from this week was the comment from Austrian Jesuit Andreas Batlogg, a biographer and admirer of Francis. His assessment cut through months of conservative wishful thinking with almost surgical coldness. Leo, he said, represents more a shift in tone than a break in substance. Synodality remains. The social agenda remains. The globalist perspective remains. Francis opened the doors. Leo is organizing the rooms behind them.

That is one of those lines that should be framed and hung on the wall.

Francis was coarse, impulsive, and often seemed to enjoy humiliating Catholics who still believed the Church had a duty to speak clearly. His reign felt like a never-ending act of vandalism. Leo appears more restrained. He is less theatrical. He does not fling the furniture through the window with quite the same gusto. This has been enough to mesmerize parts of the traditional and conservative world into thinking some kind of restoration may be underway.

No restoration is underway.

What is underway is consolidation. Francis spent years breaking locks, kicking doors off hinges, and teaching Catholics to live with contradiction. Leo has arrived to make the arrangement feel less chaotic and more permanent. He is not undoing the revolution. He is managing it.

That makes him, in some ways, more dangerous.

A destroyer shocks the faithful into alarm. An organizer teaches them to adapt.

Viganò Saw the Central Contradiction

For all the noise that follows Archbishop Viganò, his recent observations about Trump and Leo touched the nerve that establishment Catholics are desperate to keep numb.

Leo says he is not a politician and the Gospel should not be instrumentalized. Yet his public pattern reveals a man quite willing to deploy moral language in ways that align almost perfectly with the approved assumptions of the post-Christian ruling class. The modern Vatican finds its voice readily enough when migration, climate, social management, and anti-national moralism are on the menu. Its courage tends to evaporate when the subject is China, Islam, doctrinal rebellion, liturgical ruin, or the plain need to defend Christian civilization against those dismantling it.

The papacy exists to confirm the brethren, condemn error, preserve the deposit, and rule souls toward heaven. The conciliar papacy has increasingly presented itself as a floating moral platform for transnational humanitarian consensus. It speaks with tremendous confidence when echoing the assumptions of global managerial liberalism. It grows hesitant, vague, or suddenly “pastoral” when the demands of Catholic truth would bring it into direct conflict with the idols of the age.

That was true under Francis. It is true under Leo. The tone changed, but the operating logic stayed put.

Which brings us back to the old photograph. A man does not spend his early years marching in a Communist-organized protest against Reagan, then somehow emerge as a naturally balanced statesman of Catholic order. The sentimental leftism of youth matured into the ecclesiastical leftism of office. The clothes changed. The reflex remained.

The Anti-Trump Clerical Mood

Another story revealed something ugly beneath the surface. A priest in Ireland, praying during Mass, prayed that “the Lord will take” Donald Trump before quickly correcting himself and trying to say that he meant the Lord would take away Trump’s pain. The congregation laughed. The clip circulated. Commenters treated it as the “greatest Freudian slip” imaginable.

That laughter told the truth.

For years Catholics have been lectured by clerics and Catholic commentators about charity, moderation, civility, decency, and the wickedness of rough political rhetoric. They speak as though the populist right introduced venom into public life, as though the clerical class itself inhabits some cleaner and more elevated moral plane. Then a priest lets the mask slip for half a second and the room erupts in delighted recognition. Everybody knows exactly what he meant because everybody knows the emotional climate in which he lives.

The modern clerical class loves to pose as tender. In practice, its tenderness is highly selective. Endless sympathy is available for public adulterers, liturgical innovators, synodal bureaucrats, pagan-friendly tribal dignitaries, and every activist cause that flatters modern liberalism. Toward Trump, toward nationalist politics, toward anyone who resists the progressive reshaping of the West, the pastoral smile often gives way to a sneer.

No, that does not make Trump a saint. It does expose the fraudulence of the clerical pose.

The laughter in that church was not the laughter of innocent misunderstanding. It was the laughter of ideological recognition.

A Cathedral Becomes a Testing Ground

The most revolting story in the bunch may have been the report from Bamenda, Cameroon. During an interreligious peace meeting inside the cathedral, a tribal leader who presides over pagan rites and ancestral ceremonies spoke of polygamy as one of the cultural practices that continue to pose challenges. He then expressed gratitude that African bishops had been tasked, in connection with the recent synodal process, with studying polygamy and its place in the life of the Church. He argued that people in polygamous relationships should be fully integrated into the Church without being judged or rejected. Leo remained silent. Some of the faithful booed.

There, in miniature, stands the whole postconciliar disaster.

A Catholic cathedral becomes a stage for the public airing of demands that the Church grow softer toward an arrangement directly contrary to the natural law and to Christian marriage. A tribal ruler linked to pagan ceremonial life is treated as a voice to be heard with deference. The vocabulary of “challenge” replaces the vocabulary of sin and disorder. The machinery of synodality hangs in the background like a waiting solvent, ready to dissolve whatever still has shape. And the pope says nothing.

His silence was the loudest line in the report.

This is how the revolution advances now. Not always through bold declarations. Often through non-correction, the absence of a rebuke, or the calm refusal to draw a line. Through the creation of an atmosphere in which the unthinkable becomes discussable, the discussable becomes pastorally understandable, and the understandable becomes practically normalized.

Rome used to travel to the ends of the earth to break pagan customs and bring nations under the sweet yoke of Christ. The new Rome invites those customs into a softer conversation and asks how the Church may accommodate the resulting tensions without causing pain..

The People Still Know When Something Stinks

The faithful in attendance reportedly booed. Good for them.

That small detail shows that ordinary Catholics often retain a moral instinct long after their shepherds have traded theirs in for process language. They know when the sanctuary has been treated with contempt.

The synodal class despises that instinct. It regards such reactions as rigid, unwelcoming, unnuanced, insufficiently dialogical. Yet that instinct is often closer to Catholic health than the smooth language of those forever proposing new forms of accompaniment for old forms of rebellion.

A peasant woman who knows that polygamy has no place in the Church may possess a sounder ecclesial judgment than a room full of experts speaking gravely about discernment.

The Old Leftism Never Really Left

It would be a mistake to reduce everything here to partisan politics in the narrow American sense. The issue is not simply that Leo once marched against Ronald Reagan. The issue is that the entire moral and political sensibility visible in that world has matured into ecclesiastical form.

What kind of churchman protests American missiles in a Communist-organized march, then decades later speaks and governs in ways that steadily flatter the international left’s moral imagination. The same kind. The same type.

The men who spent years assuring us that Francis was merely rough in style but orthodox at heart now want us to believe Leo is orthodox because his style is smoother. It is getting harder for them to keep the script straight.

The old photo from Comiso makes their job harder because it restores historical memory and reminds everyone that these instincts did not emerge from nowhere. They have political and moral ancestry.

And that ancestry was never Catholic in the old Roman sense. It was postwar clerical leftism.

The photograph from Comiso is not interesting because it embarrasses Leo. It is interesting because it tells the truth about him.

---

If you value independent Catholic analysis and want to help keep this work going, you can make a contribution or subscribe below. Every donation and subscription directly supports the writing, research, and production of Hiraeth in Exile.

Thank you for helping preserve independent Catholic journalism rooted in truth and tradition.