Gardens, Ghost Parishes, and “Da Pope” Beer: Notes from a Synodal Church

While Detroit shutters parishes and Rome drafts manuals on “managing resistance,” Leo XIV blesses ecology, JB Pritzker brings the beer, and Our Lady is quietly shown the door.

A Week in Paradise (Lost)

If you wanted a snapshot of the post-conciliar Church in late 2025, this week would do nicely.

In Rome, study groups on “controversial doctrinal, pastoral, and ethical issues” are hard at work explaining that we are living through a paradigm shift; a phrase they now use openly. Detroit is announcing yet another round of parish closures in the wake of collapsing baptisms and Mass attendance. Leo XIV devotes a general audience in the Jubilee of Hope to “Easter spirituality and integral ecology.”

In Charlotte, Bishop Michael Martin calls for fasting and lobbying Congress over immigration raids, but reassures people that they’re not obliged to go to Mass if they’re afraid of the feds. A Chicago billionaire governor arrives in the Vatican bearing a four-pack of “Da Pope” craft beer for the man formerly known as Robert Prevost.

And the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, having already told us that Our Lady should not be called Co-Redemptrix, now allows one of its experts to say bluntly that seeing Mary as holding back God’s wrath is superstitious and “not in accordance with the Gospel.”

Same week. Same “synodal process.” Same revolution.

The Committee That Wants to Manage Your Resistance

Start with “Study Group 9”: Theological criteria and synodal methodologies for shared discernment of controversial doctrinal, pastoral, and ethical issues.

The group frankly admits that its work is about a “conversion of thought and transformation of practices” in light of Vatican II and Evangelii gaudium. They speak of a “paradigm shift” affecting both theology and culture, and they are quite explicit that doctrine and life, anthropology and morality, all now move in a “circular” relationship.

Translation: you no longer start with dogma and judge experience. You start with experience and “discern” how dogma might be re-expressed so nobody has to change too much.

Some key points they highlight:

• “Relational conversion” – the primacy of relationships becomes the starting point.

• “Conversation in the Spirit” – a method elevated almost to sacrament.

• “Managing resistance” – not refuting error, but handling “cognitive, emotional, and cultural” pushback.

• Proceduralism – the big proposals are about methods, processes, levels of pertinence, and “contexts,” not about clarifying what the Church actually teaches.

Even the phrase “controversial issues” is considered too sharp; they prefer “emerging issues.” Chief among these “emerging” topics: homosexuality, conflicts and non-violence, and violence against women in war.

What is conspicuously not listed as “emerging”? Contraception, abortion, gender ideology, sacrilegious Communions, or the collapse of belief in the Real Presence. The real “controversial issue” is the Catholic faith itself.

The group openly says the goal is not to provide solutions valid for all, but to offer “reference criteria” that local actors can “enrich” in their own contexts. In other words: Rome hands you a set of talking points and a method; the doctrinal drift happens downwind. This is how you keep one set of texts on the Vatican website and fifty different “pastoral applications” in the dioceses.

At least they are honest about one thing: the real battle is not what they believe, but how they will implement it and how they intend to neutralize those who resist.

Detroit’s Ghost Parishes: When the Harvest Fails, Fire the Farmers

While Rome drafts glossaries on “relational conversion,” Detroit is quietly turning into a sacramental graveyard.

The numbers are brutal. The Archdiocese once built churches for 1.5 million Catholics. Today it counts about 900,000, and fewer than half of those show up at Mass with any regularity. Baptisms, First Communions, confirmations, and marriages have been in steep decline since 2000. In 2010, 252 priests served the archdiocese; there are 224 now, and that figure is projected to fall by another 40% in the next decade. Three-quarters of parishes are expected to shrink over the next five years, and roughly two-thirds already have fewer than 600 people at Sunday Mass.

Archbishop Edward Weisenburger’s solution is a “two-year restructuring process” that will merge parishes, close churches, and bundle the survivors into “pastorates”: clusters overseen by one priest and his team. The official line is that the archdiocese is “stretched too thinly” maintaining buildings where “there are very few people,” and that this consolidation will allow a renewed focus on “areas where the Church is growing.” It’s the standard post-conciliar script: we’re not managing collapse, we’re seizing “blessed opportunities.”

But this isn’t happening under some hapless bureaucrat who merely inherited a mess. It’s happening under the same archbishop who spent his first months in Detroit swinging the Traditionis custodes hammer.

In April 2025, the archdiocese announced that permissions for parish Traditional Latin Masses would expire on July 1, 2025 and could not be renewed, because Rome had reserved to itself the authority to allow extraordinary form liturgies in parish churches. Weisenburger’s “update” meant that thriving parish TLMs across metro Detroit would simply disappear, replaced by a handful of non-parish sites. By mid-June, he formalized the policy: four designated locations, St. Joseph Shrine in Detroit (already a personal parish under the Institute of Christ the King), plus three other non-parish churches in the remaining regions, would be the only places where the old rite could be offered publicly, while permissions everywhere else would lapse.

The blow didn’t stop with the old Mass. A companion document, the Traditionis Custodes Implementation Norms dated June 12, 2025, went after traditional elements in the Novus Ordo as well. The norms banned ad orientem celebration in parish liturgies and ordered the installation and use of freestanding altars, effectively marginalizing any attempt to celebrate the new rite in continuity with the old. In other words: not only will you lose your parish Latin Mass, you will also lose the reverent Novus Ordo that looks too much like it.

Then came the seminary purge. In July 2025, Weisenburger abruptly removed three of the most prominent conservative voices at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, theologians Ralph Martin and Eduardo Echeverria, and canonist Edward Peters, after decades of service. Reports across the Catholic press noted that all three had publicly raised concerns about doctrinal ambiguity and pastoral novelties under Francis; their dismissals were announced without a substantive explanation, but widely read as a deliberate changing of ideological guard in Detroit.

So when this same archbishop now tells Detroit Catholics that parish closures and pastorates are about “vibrant parishes,” “flourishing priests,” and being “mission ready,” the subtext is hard to miss. The “vibrant” parish is the one that has reconciled itself to the post-conciliar program; the “flourishing” presbyterate is the one that no longer publicly questions that program; the “mission” is to align the local Church with the new paradigm coming out of Rome.

The harvest has failed, but instead of asking what was planted, they are demolishing barns, ripping out anything that looks like tradition, and firing the farmers who remember what a healthy field once looked like.

Easter Spirituality Meets Climate Policy

Into this landscape, Leo XIV offers a Jubilee catechesis on “The Resurrection of Christ and the challenges of today’s world,” ending in a call for “Easter spirituality and integral ecology.”

He notes that Mary Magdalene mistakes the risen Christ for a gardener, and he leans hard into the image. Christ, he says, fulfils the original task of “cultivating and keeping the garden.” From here, the homily slides smoothly into Laudato si’: ecological culture, environmental “resistance,” a “conversion” that changes history and creates new forms of solidarity, a “garden” we must recover.

The Resurrection becomes the foundation, not primarily of faith in Christ’s victory over sin and death, but of a “spirituality of integral ecology.” Paradise is “found again” when we adopt a certain way of looking at the environment. The greatest threat is no longer eternal perdition; it is pollution and “the longings of wolves” menacing the garden of the planet.

None of this is heresy in the strict textbook sense. It is something harder to pin down and easier to feel: the re-centering of Christian vocabulary around horizontal goals. Sin becomes “wounding the earth.” Salvation becomes “harmony with creation.” Hope becomes climate realism with a pious glaze.

You can stand in St. Peter’s Square in a Jubilee of Hope and walk away thinking more about recycling.

Charlotte: Sanctuary Piety for People Evading the Law

UIn Charlotte, Bishop Michael Martin responded to a federal immigration enforcement surge by issuing a “call to prayer, fasting, and solidarity.” He urges Catholics to reach out to migrants, to fast on Nov. 21, to contact their representatives and push for “comprehensive immigration reform,” and not to “vilify federal agents who have been sent to our community.”

So far, that’s just standard USCCB boilerplate. But then he crosses a very different line:

“To those of you who are afraid to come to church, you are not obligated to attend Mass when you are inhibited from doing so by circumstances beyond your control, as the Church has always taught.”

In other words: if you are in the country illegally, are afraid of being arrested because federal agents are doing their job, your absence from Sunday Mass counts as being “inhibited” by circumstances beyond your control.

This is a soft amnesty sermon dressed up as pastoral sensitivity.

Every state has, by natural law and Catholic teaching, the right and duty to regulate its borders for the common good. The Catechism speaks of a right to migrate, yes, but it also affirms the right of political authorities to enforce just immigration laws. The people being arrested in “Operation Charlotte’s Web” are not random victims of fate; they are, at a minimum, in ongoing violation of immigration law, and in many cases they are tied to additional criminal activity. DHS itself has reported more than 130 arrests in the first weekend of the operation, with CBP and ICE specifically targeting prior offenders.

And the climate is not one-sided. Just this week, the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina announced federal charges against two Charlotte men, Cristobal Maltos and Miguel Angel Garcia Martinez, for using their vehicles to assault or impede federal officers during immigration operations. In one case, a suspect allegedly led officers on a high-speed chase, driving into oncoming traffic and finally ramming a government vehicle occupied by four federal agents. In the other, a driver is accused of striking a Border Patrol officer with his side mirror when agents in uniform tried to make contact.

This is the environment Bishop Martin is speaking into: armed federal operations, violent resistance, agents being attacked with vehicles, and his public message is that those trying to evade arrest can feel spiritually covered for skipping Mass.

Where is the diocesan day of fasting over the children killed by fentanyl trafficked by illegal aliens, which the very same U.S. Attorney’s office regularly prosecutes? Where is the pastoral letter reminding Catholics that obeying just laws, including immigration laws, is a basic demand of the moral law? Where is the explicit warning that assaulting federal officers with a vehicle is a mortal sin against justice, not an understandable act of “desperation”?

Instead, we get a familiar script: “comprehensive reform,” “both parties have failed,” “contact your representatives.” The Church’s own language about the state’s right to control borders never appears. The focus is entirely on the emotional state of people who, whatever their personal stories, are in open violation of the law, and some of whom, as the DOJ press releases show, are willing to endanger officers and the public to avoid arrest.

It would be bad enough coming from any generic post-conciliar bishop. But this is Michael Martin, the same bishop who, earlier this year, finished “completing the implementation” of Traditionis custodes in Charlotte by abolishing the Traditional Latin Mass in parish churches and corralling it into a single non-parish chapel in Mooresville, hours away for many families. The same bishop whose leaked draft norms floated bans on ad orientem, stricter limits on kneeling for Communion, and the sidelining of traditional vestments and Latin in the liturgy, followed by an actual prohibition on using the altar rail at Charlotte Catholic High School.

So the pattern is clear. When the state cracks down on illegal immigration, Martin speaks of fear, solidarity, and “circumstances beyond your control.” When he cracks down on faithful attached to the ancient Mass, he speaks of discipline, unity, and the need to “complete” restrictions from Rome; no exemptions for those driving two hours with a van full of kids, no talk of their “fear and uncertainty,” no suggestion that their absence from the TLM is morally excused.

For law-abiding Catholics who watched their parish Latin Mass abolished, their altar rails removed, and their attempts at reverence treated as a problem to be managed, it is hard not to notice the disparity. The bishop stretches canon law to comfort people hiding from immigration enforcement, but applies it with full severity to the families who just want the Mass of their ancestors.

“Da Pope” Beer and the Sanctuary Governor

Then there is Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, who flew to Rome with gifts for Leo XIV: art from incarcerated women, a couple of books, and a four-pack of “Da Pope American Mild Ale” from a Chicago brewery. Leo smiles, takes the beer, and jokes, “We’ll put that in the fridge.” It plays like a cute hometown moment: Chicago’s sanctuary governor glad-handing Chicago’s pope.

But Pritzker isn’t just some neutral civic dignitary. He turned Illinois into an abortion safe haven, signing laws that declare abortion a “fundamental right” and aggressively marketing the state as a destination for “reproductive health care.” He’s also spent years shielding illegal aliens from federal enforcement and publicly attacking efforts to restore control at the border, all while Chicago’s homicide and drug crisis rages. This is the man whose “message of hope and compassion” Leo’s handlers are happy to celebrate for the cameras.

We’ve seen this movie before. Cardinal Cupich tried to hand a “lifetime achievement” award to Senator Dick Durbin, a lifelong pro-abortion “Catholic,” for his work on immigration, and Leo responded not with open rebuke but with the usual “consistent life ethic” fog that puts border policy and industrialized child-killing on the same moral plane. The message to Catholic politicians is clear: stay on the right side of the immigration narrative and Rome will not make your abortion record a problem.

In that light, the “Da Pope” beer isn’t a charming human detail. It’s a symbol of what the modern papacy has become: a brand lending moral cover to Catholic-branded politicians who legislate against the Fifth Commandment. Once, popes received chalices from persecuted Catholics and relics from missions. Now the first American pope poses with a sanctuary governor who turned Illinois into an abortion hub and grins over a novelty ale with his own nickname on the label.

When the office stops guarding the faith, it doesn’t go quiet. It goes commercial, and someone else’s agenda gets stamped with the keys of Peter.

Women, Intercommunion, and a Synodal Liturgy Without Tradition

Hannah Brockhaus’ summary of the synodal study groups fills in the rest of the picture.

• The question of female deacons has been quietly lifted out of the synod and handed to a revived 2020 commission whose members “respond to the Holy Father.” In other words, the real fireworks will happen offstage, behind closed doors.

• One group on ministries is focused on women’s participation in leadership, gathering testimonies from women already in authority and mining the speeches of Francis and Leo XIV.

• Another group on canon law is exploring expanded roles for laity, especially women, in tribunals and liturgical functions.

• A group on ecumenism is studying “Eucharistic hospitality,” the polite phrase for giving Holy Communion to non-Catholics. They will approach it the modern way: not as a question of sacrilege, but as a “theological, canonical, and pastoral” issue to be “deepened.”

• A new group on liturgy, created at Leo’s request, is tasked with making the liturgy “more synodal,” boosting participation, re-reading preaching through a synodal lens, giving more space to the “role of women in the history of salvation,” and exploring “healthy decentralization” of liturgical authority for inculturation.

Notice what they are not allowed to touch: the restrictions on the traditional Latin Mass. That minefield has been fenced off by Traditionis custodes and its follow-up documents. Decentralization is for everything except the ancient Roman rite, which must remain centralized, surveilled, and slowly starved.

So we arrive at the usual post-conciliar paradox: everything is up for “discernment” except the one thing that actually carries the full weight of Catholic tradition. On that point, there is no synodality, no listening, no managing “resistance.” There is only command.

“Superstition” vs. Scripture: Does Mary Hold Back God’s Wrath?

The most revealing line in the whole Mater Populi Fidelis rollout wasn’t in the text but in the commentary. Father Maurizio Gronchi, one of the DDF’s experts, said it is “superstition” to think the Virgin Mary “has the role of holding back God’s wrath,” and that whoever thinks this way “is not in accordance with the Gospel.” Suddenly it’s not just Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix on the chopping block; it’s the entire idea that Our Lady’s intercession can avert chastisement.

But the logic he condemns is simply the biblical logic of intercession. Abraham bargains for Sodom; Moses stands in the breach for Israel; God “relents” from punishments in response to the prayers of His friends. Not because He changes His eternal will, but because He freely wills to tie certain graces to their prayers. That is what it means when we say the saints “appease” or “avert” God’s wrath: divine justice is real, and so is the fact that God has chosen to factor their petitions into His providence.

If that is true of ordinary saints, it is strange to suddenly declare it dangerous when applied in a unique way to the Woman at the foot of the Cross. The entire Marian tradition, from the Fathers through the great Doctors, assumes that her intercession has real weight in the order of grace. Popes have called her Reparatrix, “suppliant omnipotence,” treasurer of graces, and Mother to whom we fly precisely in times when chastisement threatens. Fatima’s basic structure is nothing else: a world hanging under judgment, and a Mother whose requests for prayer and penance obtain delays and mitigations.

The trick in Gronchi’s line is a caricature of God. No Catholic who knows their catechism imagines Mary “talking down” an irritable Father. Classical theology has always been clear: God does not change; “wrath” is analogical for the effect of divine justice on obstinate sinners. To say that Mary’s intercession “holds back” wrath means that God has eternally willed to grant certain graces, conversion instead of hardening, protection instead of punishment, because she asks for them. Deny that, and you don’t just flatten Marian piety; you gut the entire doctrine of the Communion of Saints.

So when a Vatican official tells the faithful that seeing Mary as a real shield against judgment is “not in accordance with the Gospel,” he isn’t just trimming excesses. He is sawing off a branch Scripture, the Fathers, the popes, and the great apparitions have all been sitting on for centuries.

The revolution doesn’t just want a smaller Mariology. It wants a safer, softer God; one whose justice never really threatens, and whose Mother no longer needs to stand in anyone’s way.

What This Week Really Shows

Strip away the press releases and pious slogans and the pattern is simple enough.

The “paradigm shift” is the steady replacement of a God who judges and saves with a God who affirms and accompanies; of a Church that commands with a Church that consults; of a faith ordered to eternity with a religion absorbed in managing this world.

The lesson for us is not to chase every new phrase and framework, but to stop being surprised. This is what the postconciliar machine does. It will continue to close parishes while telling you the Spirit is doing “something new.” It will continue to talk about “listening” while silencing the one liturgy and the one Marian language that actually bind us to what came before.

Our task, then, is brutally uncomplicated: refuse the swap. Keep the old God, the old Mass, the old Marian courage, the old moral clarity, even if you have to live them in exile. Let them have their processes and paradigms. We keep the Faith.

In the end, the revolution only works if the remnant consents to be managed. The one thing they cannot synodally “accompany” into extinction is a Catholic who knows what he has received, and will not trade it for a glossary.

If you value independent Catholic analysis and want to help keep this work going, you can make a contribution or subscribe below. Every donation and subscription directly supports the writing, research, and production of Hiraeth in Exile.

Thank you for helping preserve independent Catholic journalism rooted in truth and tradition.