A Leo in the Circus, a Church in the Confessional

Lasers for the clowns, absolution for the nation, baptism as branding, and “Trad Inc.” selling patience as a virtue while cashing the checks

The week’s pattern: spectacle, therapy, and managed dissent

The postconciliar regime keeps returning to the same three moves.

First, it launders the sacred through spectacle. It borrows the language of joy, encounter, inclusion, creativity, evolution, the future, then it waves away the question of modesty, reverence, doctrine, and judgment as if those belong to a museum wing labeled “yesterday.”

Second, it turns sin into sociology. It replaces confession with a public performance of national feelings. It treats guilt like a political currency. It offers absolution like a press statement. You hear the vocabulary of redemption, then you watch it get applied to categories that sound more like a university panel than a catechism.

Third, it builds a tame opposition class that survives by never naming the culprit too clearly. They quote the old lions, then they leash them. They keep the brand of resistance, then they drain the resistance of its teeth. They call that strategy “the long game.” The faithful call it what it feels like: surrender with better typography.

This roundup gives four snapshots of the same disease.

The circus photo op: when shepherds pose, the wolves applaud

(Photos courtesy of Tradition in Action)

On January 7, 2026, Leo XIV received participants from Zoppis Circus, in Rome with a show marketed as “Evolution” and “the Circus of the Future.” Robots, lights, lasers, fluorescent costumes, the whole modern aesthetic of stimulation without shame.

A Catholic shepherd never needed a PhD in “performance studies” to grasp what the circus culture traffics in: bodily display, suggestive movement, the normalization of indecency as entertainment. The modern world calls it art. A confessor calls it an occasion of sin. A saint calls it poison.

The deeper issue lives beyond one handshake and one photo.

This is the conciliar instinct to court the world’s applause through novelty. The old Church converted pagans by preaching Christ crucified, then building a civilization around His altar. The new Church courts pagans by smiling for the cameras while standing near whatever looks fun, current, and friction free.

When Leo XIV smiles for “the circus of the future,” he signals the future he prefers: one where Catholics learn to laugh at what once required tears, one where modesty becomes optional, one where morality becomes a private quirk, one where shepherds function as public relations managers for a global brand.

Rome used to fear scandal. Rome now stages it with a good lighting rig.

Soweto’s national confession: when politics steals the confessional, grace becomes a prop

See video here: https://www.gloria.tv/share/TzCbGKDURsRU1cWZYygWN6RUU

In June 2025, during an ecumenical National Day of Prayer service at Grace Bible Church in Soweto, the South African Council of Churches led a collective confession of sins. The congregation confessed colonialism, apartheid, racism, corruption, violence, injustice. Then a Catholic bishop, Sipuka, declared forgiveness: “By the grace of God and the love of Christ, you are forgiven.”

That moment encapsulates the modern ecclesiastical collapse.

Catholic absolution belongs to the sacrament of Penance, ordered to individual souls, individual contrition, individual confession, individual purpose of amendment, the authority of Christ exercised through His priest. The Church never possessed a mandate to stand in a stadium of mixed denominations and pronounce a blanket pardon over a nation as if the confessional were a civic ritual and the keys of Peter were a microphone.

This maps perfectly onto the political religion of the age. The secular elite loves collective guilt rituals, especially when the list of sins happens to match the preferred ideological script. The same crowd that rejects personal moral accountability for abortion, pornography, divorce culture, and the sexual revolution suddenly becomes devout about public penitence for approved historical categories. They want liturgy without dogma, confession without commandments, forgiveness without conversion.

America recognizes this instinct immediately because we see it daily: corporations kneeling for slogans, bureaucracies preaching “equity,” schools catechizing children into guilt by demographic category, politicians demanding repentance for crimes you never committed while they excuse the crimes happening now in your neighborhood.

A Catholic bishop joining that ritual does not baptize it. He gets baptized by it. He steps into the world’s ideological temple, then he plays priest for their civil religion.

The old Faith knows a better path. Preach the Gospel. Call souls to repentance. Name the real sins of the age, including the fashionable ones. Offer the sacrament in its proper form. Convert the sinner. Convert the nation by converting souls. Anything else becomes a counterfeit mercy that trains people to expect pardon without penance.

Baptism as a brand: Leo XIV’s Angelus and the sentimental gospel of “together”

On Sunday, January 11, 2026, Leo XIV preached an Angelus for the Feast of the Baptism of the Lord. The words contain orthodox fragments: the Trinity at the Jordan, the Spirit descending, the Father’s voice, the gift of Baptism, the grace that frees from sin.

Then the modern tone takes over. The message becomes an emotional invitation to “follow together,” to “imitate gestures of love,” to be “one family,” to celebrate “a plan of love for all humanity.” It sounds warm. It also functions as a solvent.

The pre Vatican II mind reads Baptism in sharper contours: original sin, regeneration, incorporation into the true Church, the necessity of grace, the moral law, the warfare against the world, the flesh, and the devil. Baptism gives a new life. That new life demands a new rule.

The conciliar style keeps sliding toward therapy language where the Church exists to affirm, accompany, include, soothe. The priest becomes a facilitator. The bishop becomes a motivational speaker. The pope becomes a global chaplain for humanity’s feelings.

Leo XIV even highlights the baptism of newborns with a kind of photogenic sweetness. The old Church celebrated infant baptism with awe and fear, since a soul was being rescued from the dominion of darkness and transferred into the Kingdom of Christ. The new Church keeps the awe, then trades the fear for warm fuzzies.

Baptism is not a membership card for a human fraternity. It is an enlistment. It places a mark on the soul. It obliges belief, worship, obedience, and a life shaped by the commandments of God and the teachings of the one true Church. The world hates that. The modern Vatican tries to phrase it in ways the world can tolerate.

Catholic instincts understand this too. A nation survives by borders, law, enforcement, and loyalty. A church survives by dogma, discipline, sacraments, and holiness. A borderless nation collapses into chaos. A borderless church collapses into sentiment.

Leo XIV speaks as if the chief danger is distance, misunderstanding, unconcern. The old Church knew the chief danger: sin, unbelief, false religion, scandal, and the eternal loss of souls.

Trad Inc.’s long game: patience marketed as prudence, silence sold as strategy

Robert Morrison’s January 12, 2026 column for The Remnant, “Leo XIV Perpetuates the Crisis, but Traditional Catholicism’s Response Remains the Same,” offers a familiar argument. The revolution continues. Nothing Leo XIV does surprises informed traditional Catholics. The remedy is fidelity, sanctity, and refusing to diminish the Faith. Morrison leans on a 1975 Lefebvre sermon to remind readers that the real battle is the revolution itself, not the generals.

The quotations from Archbishop Lefebvre ring true. The analysis of false ecumenism rings true. The insistence on no compromise rings true.

Then the column performs a sleight of hand.

It uses Lefebvre as a shield for quietism. It suggests that naming Leo XIV’s concrete acts, appointments, scandals, betrayals becomes a kind of obsessive distraction. It warns that condemnations of Rome can become “the primary part of our Faith.” It implies that a restrained posture, calm, patient, focused on personal sanctity, represents the wiser course.

Lefebvre did not live that way.

He preached. He warned. He acted. He resisted publicly. He named the errors. He confronted Rome while building what was necessary to preserve the priesthood and the Mass. He did not reduce his witness to timeless quotations while leaving the present crisis undescribed. He did not treat the generals as irrelevant when those generals used power to crush the faithful.

The “long game” rhetoric functions like political consultant talk. It keeps donors hopeful. It keeps readers calm. It keeps the brand safe. It keeps access open. It keeps the resistance professionalized.

The controlled opposition class always preaches patience. They always promise a future turnaround. They always warn against “division.” They always advise you to focus on your private life while institutions get captured, courts get staffed, bureaucracies get weaponized, children get catechized into lies, borders get erased, criminals get released, citizens get told to lower their expectations.

Trad Inc. told readers to be hopeful about Leo XIV early on. Now they pivot into “none of this surprises us.” They rewrite the timeline, then they present their own earlier cheerleading as prudence. They want credit for realism while they discouraged realism when it mattered.

The question is simple. How long is the long game? Fifty years? One hundred years? Until the last traditional chapel becomes a tolerated exhibit under diocesan supervision? Until the old Mass survives as a curiosity for tourists? Until the faith becomes a lifestyle niche?

This is not strategy. This is a rationalization for silence while the machine keeps moving.

Professor Kwasniewski Also Plays the “Long Game”

(View on X by clicking image)

Peter Kwasniewski@DrKwasniewski

«We do not need a perfect pope or a Christian monarch in order to be fully Catholic, here and now, in our daily lives. To think, feel, breathe, love, as Catholics. To cherish what is good and holy and beautiful and right. To inculcate the same values in our offspring. To play the

5:18 PM · Jan 12, 2026 · 2.96K Views

---

4 Replies · 10 Reposts · 53 Likes

Kwasniewski’s “long game” sermon is the kind of counsel that always sounds noble right up until you notice the velvet rope.

We don’t need a perfect pope, he says. True. We also do not need a perfect lifeboat to admit the ship is sinking, or to point at the people drilling holes in the hull. That is the missing step in this genre.

Then comes the soothing inventory of permitted hobbies. They cannot stop you from the Office, the Rosary, the Angelus, chants, hymns, the domestic church, underground Masses, inviting a priest friend over, moving to a better place. In other words, the Faith reduced to a portable kit you can carry while the visible Church gets strip mined. Keep the candles. Keep the customs. Keep your head down. If the diocese crushes you, relocate like a refugee and call it resilience.

He even reaches for the English recusants, which is the tell. The recusants were not quietists. They did not build a lifestyle brand around “short term losses.” They endured because the regime was openly hostile and they could not pretend otherwise. Their heroism included resistance, clarity, and the refusal to flatter the men destroying the order. They did not confuse survival tactics with a strategy for winning.

Now add the punchline. This pep talk about how “no one can take the Faith away from you” is delivered as a promotional excerpt for an article you cannot read unless you subscribe. Pay Pelican Plus so you can be reassured that you don’t need to do anything except keep paying, keep coping, keep nesting, keep “playing the long game.” It is a remarkable business model. The pitch is spiritual self sufficiency. The delivery mechanism is recurring billing.

There is a particular kind of traditionalist influencer who has discovered the safest lane in the Leo era. Call bishops apostate in the abstract. Call the system warped in the abstract. Speak of suffering in the abstract. Then refuse to name names, refuse to apply principles to present actors, refuse to draw blood, refuse to risk access. Wrap it in piety, sprinkle in recusant lore, then close with “God always wins” as a substitute for the duty to speak.

It reads like the same memo making the rounds. Keep people calm. Tell them the Faith is in their hands. Tell them to build the domestic church. Tell them to move if they have to. Tell them it is not about the generals. Tell them it is not worth “fixating.” Then collect the subscription.

Yes, no one can take the Faith away from you. They can take your parish Mass. They can take your sacraments down to a tolerated exhibit. They can take your children’s formation and replace it with therapy catechisms. They can take your priests and pressure them into compliance. They can take the public witness of the Church and turn it into circus photo ops and ecumenical absolution ceremonies. They can do all of that while you are told that calling it out is unnecessary, maybe even unspiritual.

That is not the long game. That is surrender.

The revolution’s operating system: ecumenism, spectacle, and moral disarmament

Put the pieces together and the picture sharpens.

A pontiff poses with the circus of the future, smiling beside fluorescent theatrics while the moral question gets shrugged away as prudishness.

A Catholic bishop stands inside an ecumenical service and declares collective forgiveness over sociological sins, training people to think absolution belongs to public politics rather than sacramental repentance.

An Angelus on Baptism leans toward sentimental universality, smoothing the edges that define conversion, obedience, judgment, and the necessity of the Church.

Traditional media managers quote Lefebvre to argue against focusing on the present acts of the present regime, offering timeless principles and a Pelican Plus subscription as a substitute for timely resistance.

This is the post Vatican II system functioning exactly as designed. It converts the Church from a fortress of salvation into a therapeutic NGO. It replaces the confessional with cultural catechisms. It replaces the saints with performers. It replaces resistance with commentary.

The pre Vatican II Catholic response remains the same, in the only sense that matters.

No compromise. No participation in false worship. No sacramental cosplay for ecumenical optics. No applause for indecency. No sentimental gospel that evacuates the hard edges of Christ’s Kingship. No “long game” that asks the faithful to watch their inheritance get dismantled while the professionals monetize patience.

The revolution continues. The question is whether anyone still says no out loud, in public, with consequences.

---

If you value independent Catholic analysis and want to help keep this work going, you can make a contribution or subscribe below. Every donation and subscription directly supports the writing, research, and production of Hiraeth in Exile.

Thank you for helping preserve independent Catholic journalism rooted in truth and tradition.